Contents |
Judith was born in about 1727 but this is inconsistent with the ages of persons thought to be her children.
No records have been found regarding Judith until her husband, Moses Lassiter wrote his will on 26 Feb 1767 in Chowan County, North Carolina. She was among the beneficiaries. He leaves the plantation to his son, Frederick, but Judith has the use of it during her natural lifetime.[1][2][3][4]
An inventory of Moses Lassiter's estate was done on the 27 Jul 1767. Apparently, Judith died soon after Moses. Jeremiah Mizell becomes the guardian of Moses Lassiter's orphans, Frederick, Jethro, Timothy and Millicent, on 21 Mar 1769, placing her death between 27 Jul 1707 and 21 Mar 1769, i.e., about 1768.[5][6]
I have been unsuccessful tracking down anything but online family trees that provides her surname as Eason. While there was an Eason family in the area, Judith is not the only Lassiter spouse purported to be an Eason, but again, the same situation where there is no record whatsoever. I think it is far more viable that she was a close relation to Jeremiah Mizell, probably a sister, since he was designated as guardian for her children. Unless perhaps she married him after Moses' death, which is also possible. Either way, it would be very helpful to find a single source shows any Eason married a Lassiter! - DCO August, 7 2023
Judith (Eason) Lassiter and Moses Lassiter are currently identified as parents of Jotham Jonas Lassiter. Judith Eason Lassiter is currently thought to have been born in about 1727, but this is unsourced. Jotham's son Luke Lassiter (mentioned in his will) is thought to be born in 1756. He married in 1783 to Temperance Harriss in Wake County, North Carolina. The marriage was witnessed by his older brother Hardy, born in 1750. These are Jotham's two oldest sons, and Hardy is thought to be his oldest child.
Some sources have Jotham born as early as 1723. The fact that Jotham was born before 1755 is validated by the 1800 census. Hardy's birth in 1750 means that Jotham must have have been born before 1734, the most optimistic possible birth date. If all these facts and inferences are correct, Jotham was born between 1723 (earliest reliably sourced estimate) and 1734 (latest possible birth date base on age of his oldest children. In summary, Jotham was born between 1723 and 1734. His profile currently asserts 1732.
This birth date range is important because Judith (Eason) Lassiter is currently thought to have been born in 1727. Either this birth date for Judith is incorrect or Jotham is not her son, or both. Further research is needed to validate the inferences about Jotham's son's ages and Judith's life. As a DAR ancestor (see his profile), Jotham's life and birth date has received significant review.
Featured Eurovision connections: Judith is 31 degrees from Agnetha Fältskog, 23 degrees from Anni-Frid Synni Reuß, 26 degrees from Corry Brokken, 20 degrees from Céline Dion, 26 degrees from Françoise Dorin, 26 degrees from France Gall, 28 degrees from Lulu Kennedy-Cairns, 21 degrees from Lill-Babs Svensson, 21 degrees from Olivia Newton-John, 32 degrees from Henriette Nanette Paërl, 33 degrees from Annie Schmidt and 18 degrees from Moira Kennedy on our single family tree. Login to see how you relate to 33 million family members.
E > Eason | L > Lassiter > Judith (Eason) Lassiter
Categories: Chowan County, North Carolina
Her supposed birth date may have originated with a FamilySearch profile (I'll connect it) that asserts she is the daughter of Abner Eason, Sr., but that same set of research has Abner born in 1722, five years before his daughter. Based on this, I'd say the FamilySearch research that led to the 1727 birth date for Judith is highly questionable.
Please share your perspective.
HOWEVER, the more important question is how do we know that Jotham is Juedith's son? I don't want to disturb the status quo of the profiles because it's not sourced unless we exhaust the possibilities. I've found over and over again in situations like this that the unsourced assertion is more likely to be true and false, it's just that the original source hasn't been found, or the relationship can be establish with a high degree of confidence based on a set of high confidence inferences. Jotham is my ggggg-grandfather so my priority will be trying to support or refute the assertion that she is his mother.