no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Hillegond (Roos) Roosa (1696)

Hillegond "Hilgond, Hilligond" Roosa formerly Roos aka Rosa
Born in Marbletown, Ulster County, Province of New Yorkmap
Ancestors ancestors
Wife of — married 22 May 1725 in Kingston, Ulster Co. NYmap
Descendants descendants
Died [date unknown] [location unknown]
Profile last modified | Created 14 Sep 2010
This page has been accessed 270 times.
{{{image-caption}}}
Hillegond (Roos) Roosa was a New Netherland Descendant 1674-1776.
Join: New Netherland Settlers Project
Discuss: new_netherland

Contents

Biography

Hillegond was baptized in the Reformed Dutch Church of Kingston, New York, on Aug. 9 1696, a child of Gysbert Roos and Grietje Hendrickse Bond. Witness was Jan Rosa. [1]

Kingston marriage notice May 22 1725, says groom is widower of Barber de Wit and that this is the bride's first marriage. Also says both born and reside in Marbletown [2] Their children are:

  1. Andries, baptized 17 April 1726. [3]
  2. Gysbert, baptized 22 September 1728. [4]
  3. Mesery, baptized 13 January 1734. [5]

Church Records

Baptism
  • 1696. 9 Aug. Gysbert Roos, Grietje Hendrickse Bond. Hillegond. Wit: Jan Rosa.
Marriage
  • 1725. 22 May. Johannes Van Leuven, widower of Barber de Wit, and Hillegond Roosa, j. d., both parties born and resid. in Mormel [Marbletown]. Banns registered, 2 May.

Research Notes

LNAB

LNAB for the Hillegond baptized in August 1696 is Roos. Smith-62120 17:37, 27 October 2022 (UTC)N

Sources

  1. Hoes, page 47, #916.
  2. Hoes, page 548, #561.
  3. Hoes: p 162, entry 3466.
    1726 Apr 17, baptism of Andries. Parents: Johannes Van Leuven & Hillegond Roosa. Witnesses: Andries van Leuven, Maria Kool.
  4. Hoes: p 176, entry 3779.
    1728 Sep 22, baptism of Gysbert. Parents: Johannes Van Leuven & Hilgond Rosa. Witnesses: Gysbert Roosa, Grietjen Bont.
  5. Hoes: p 200, entry 4290.
    1734 Jan 13, baptism of Mesery. Parents: Johannes van Leuven & Hillegond Roosa. Witnesses: Johannes de Wit, Maria Brader.

Acknowledgements

  • This person was created on 14 September 2010 through the import of 124-DeCoursey.ged.




Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Hillegond by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Hillegond:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 2

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
The conflict has been resolved by merging. Your earlier comments on the subject are below, for reference. In these situations, we should try to avoid making arbitrary assignments, but instead should look for evidence to make the assignments. I note that the second recorded son of the Van Leuven couple was named Gysbert and had Gysbert Rosa and Grietjen Bont (this woman's parents) as baptism witnesses. That is good evidence (but not absolute proof) that she was their daughter. Also, Jan Roosa and Hillegond Boree were witnesses for the baptism of the first child of the Van Deusen couple, providing evidence that their daughter Hillegond was the one who married Van Deusen.

Notes on the 3 Hillegond profiles by Rick Felsing, September 2022

In The Kingston Baptisimal Records we find 2 baptisms for Hillegond Roos:

It should be noted that Gysbert Roos is a son of Jan Roos, thus Hillegond born 1696 is a niece to Hillegond b. 1698.

We also then find two marriage records for Hillegond Roos:


Now, we find confusion as to which Hillegond goes to which marriage.

Right now wikitree has:

  • Roos-1304 as daughter of Gysbert, born 1696, married to Van Leuven
  • Roos-1297 as daughter of Jan, born 1698 and married to Van Deusen
  • Roosa-373 as a combination of both, dau of Gysbert, born 1696 and married to Van Dusen

I would recommend merging Roosa-373 into Roos-1304 keeping the Van Leuven as the husband, which will leave us one profile for each Hillegond.

posted by Ellen Smith
edited by Ellen Smith
Roosa-373 and Roos-1304 appear to represent the same person because: Same father, same birth date, different husband. Read my research notes on Roos-1304. We have baptisms in 1696 and 1698 for a child named Hillegond, but we have 3 profiles. Roosa-373 is a combination of Roos-1304 and Roos-1297.Eliminating one of the 3 Hillegonds, will eliminate the extraneous profile.
posted by Rick Felsing

R  >  Roos  |  R  >  Roosa  >  Hillegond (Roos) Roosa

Categories: New Netherland Descendants 1674-1776 | New Netherland Project-Managed