| Sarah (Unknown) Miller is a part of Massachusetts history. Join: Massachusetts Project Discuss: massachusetts |
Contents |
Sarah's last name at birth is not known, but the evidence does not support the 19th century claims that she was Sarah Fitch from Connecticut. See the cogent summary of why her last name at birth was definitely not Fitch: [1]
Original sources concerning Sarah's birth or marriage in Cape Cod vital records have not yet been found. The births of her twelve children with Thomas Crosby (also written as "Crosbie" since spelling was inconsistent back in the 1600s) were carefully recorded in Eastham vital records, but the mother's name was not part of the records until the following century. Of course, in very small villages like Eastham in the early colonial period, marriages and births were known to every adult in town!
Thanks to an unusual probate situation in 1704, however, there is proof that Sarah was indeed the wife of Thomas Crosby. She was summoned to the local probate court on April 4, 1704, to confirm under oath that she had been present when Rev. John Sunderland signed his will in 1700 and had declared it was his last will and testament. She also "made oath" that "Thomas Crosbie her late Deceased Husband" was present and signed Mr. Sunderland's will as a witness. :[2]
Based on the fact that their oldest known child, Thomas, was born on April 7, 1663,[3] Sarah most likely married Thomas Crosby sometime in 1662 in Massachusetts. Based on an estimated marriage year of 1662 and the birth of her first child in 1663, she was probably born between 1641 and 1645.
Sarah was married to Thomas for about 40 years, until he died on June 11, 1702 in Boston. [4]:
Together Sarah and Thomas had twelve known children born from 1663 to 1680, including twins born in 1670, both named 'John,' only one of which survived (see Research_Notes), and triplets born in 1678 (Ann and Mercy survived to marry and have a family, but Increase died soon after birth).[6]
After Thomas Crosby died in 1702, Sarah married prosperous widower John Miller of Yarmouth, in Harwich on 28 Apr. 1703.[7]
In addition, a decade prior to Sarah's second marriage, her son Joseph had married John Miller's daughter Mehitable Crosby, so she and John Miller knew each other well.
Twin Sons Named John
Twin sons were born 4 December 1670. The oldest known record concerning their birth indicates that both sons were named John:
Although it seems odd (and makes it a bit confusing), they were probably both named John after the fact (the document was obviously written long after the fact since it contains the names of all of the children). It would basically be the same as having a single son named John who died when two months old, and then the next son born receiving the name John. That type of naming is common, and so helps to make more sense of twins with the same name.
An important thing to note is that the twin who died was not named Thomas as some genealogies report. People may have been confused because in the entry for the twin Johns the name Mr Thomas Crosbe comes at the beginning and people simply saw the name at the beginning, figured two children named John didn't make sense, and therefore the one son must be named Thomas.
There has been some confusion as to whether or not this Sarah and Sarah (Unknown) Bangs were one and the same. Some have assumed that after Thomas Crosby died, his widow, Sarah (Unknown) Crosby married Jonathan Bangs, and hence, would be the same as the Sarah found on this page. But the ages, children's births, etc. don't align with that thinking and there are no direct sources to prop up such a theory.
The bulk of the confusion most likely comes from (or at least perpetuated by) Find A Grave (FAG), in which contributors to the site have written incorrect information on the memorials of the following people: this Sarah (Unknown),Thomas Crosby, Jonathan Bangs (1640-1728), and Sarah (Unknown). The surnames of the two Sarahs and whom they each married have been muddled together at various points in time. As of 25 September 2021, anything other than the photos on the headstones found on FAG should be disregarded. The various owners of the memorials have been notified several times (a couple of them have made attempts at cleaning things up, but there are still serious errors).
See also:
Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.
Featured National Park champion connections: Sarah is 11 degrees from Theodore Roosevelt, 18 degrees from Stephanus Johannes Paulus Kruger, 10 degrees from George Catlin, 13 degrees from Marjory Douglas, 19 degrees from Sueko Embrey, 10 degrees from George Grinnell, 23 degrees from Anton Kröller, 10 degrees from Stephen Mather, 18 degrees from Kara McKean, 13 degrees from John Muir, 15 degrees from Victoria Hanover and 24 degrees from Charles Young on our single family tree. Login to find your connection.
[Do you know Sarah's family name?] | M > Miller > Sarah (Unknown) Miller
Categories: Massachusetts Project-Managed
I agree that based on the death date of John Miller, and the death date of Jonathan Bangs' first wife, it is very tempting to jump to the conclusion that this Sarah Unknown was actually the 2nd wife of Jonathan Bangs (and he was her third husband). But I think this is premature. After checking the new sources given on Unknown-490870, I'm wondering: which of these sources are you relying on as documentation for merging these two profiles?
I've studied sources 1, 3, and 5, all of which refer to "Sarah _____" . Source #4, page 35, refers to Jonathan Bang's 2nd wife as "Sarah Crosby", but it's a handwritten family sheet, with no sources that I could identify. In any case, I'm dubious that is the documentation needed for WikiTree, because any original record from the 1700s would show the marriage as between Jonathan Banks and Sarah Miller, since that is what she would have been known as in 1712 after the death of her second husband.
This leaves source #2, Dean Dudley's 1896, "see person # 4, pages 19 and 22". I don't have access to this private publication. If you believe that is the missing link, I would be very grateful if you could share the relevant pages as a PDF with me via wikitree email. Finally, any idea where the "Lewis, Cobb" came from as possible previous last names? I'm very interested in resolving this -- Sarah ______ Crosby is the source of my mtDNA and I'd like to post that here soon! Also , the Crosbys from Rowley really convey a lot about the religious and economic reasons for leaving England, and the challenges of life and death in the early decades of English colonization of Massachusetts.
I think much of the problem comes from Find A Grave which has completely botched the wife of Jonathan Bangs by a) claiming she was Sarah Fitch, and b) claiming she married Thomas Crosby first - both are inaccurate.
Once Sarah Unknown-490870 is removed as a spouse of Thomas Crosby then the sources for both Sarah's should be gone through and sorted out so that only the correct info goes with the correct Sarah (it looks like that may have already been done).
When I have a little more time this afternoon I may go through and look at all of the profiles involved and see if I can add any information to the biographies or sources.
~Scott
edited by Scott Carles
What happened to Sarah after 1711 when Mr. Miller died? Per Brewster (MA) gravestone & info on FindaGrave (#15178819), she died 11 Jun 1719, and her third husband was Capt. Jonathan Bangs of Brewster, who outlived her. So the death place listed as Fairfield, CT, is unlikely, since transporting bodies was very rare back then! Given that all Sarah's children were with Rev. Crosby, wouldn't it be better to list her name as "Sarah (unknown) Crosby aka Miller, Bangs"?
Thanks Maureen