Nathan Wheeler died in Newbury, Essex, Massachusetts, USA
Marriage
Rowley VRs:
"WHEELER Nathan (Wheler), and Elizabeth Safford of Ipswich, Jan. 13, 1689-90. *"[2]
Ipswich VRs:
"Safford, Elizabeth, and Nathan Wheeler, at Rowley, Jan 13, 1689/90."[3]
Research Notes
I am not finding a birth record for an Elizabeth Wheeler born or baptized 1704/5 daughter of Jethro and/or Hannah Wheeler in either Rowley or Newbury. There is a record of Elisabeth Wheeler, daughter of Nathan, being baptized 15 Oct 1704 in Rowley, Essex, Massachusetts. See: "Vital records of Rowley, Massachusetts to the end of the year 1849", Births Pg. 230. https://ma-vitalrecords.org/MA/Essex/Rowley/Images/Rowley_B230.shtml
According to this book: by Wheeler, Albert Gallatin. "The Genealogical and Encyclopedic History of the Wheeler Family in America" published by American College of Genealogy, 1914,
Ramsburgh, Edith Roberts. Genealogical Department, "Daughters of the American Revolution Magazine" (The National Society of the Daughters of the American Revolution, August 1923) Vol. 57, No. 8, Whole No. 372, Page 478
Blodgette, Geroge Brainard; Jewett, Amos Everett. Early settlers of Rowley, Massachusetts (Rowley, Massachusetts, 1933)
Is Nathan your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or contact
the profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Nathan by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA.
Y-chromosome DNA test-takers in his direct paternal line on WikiTree:
Reginald Wheeler :
AncestryDNA Paternal Lineage (discontinued) 46 markers, haplogroup I-1, Ancestry member rwheeler90 +
Family Tree DNA Y-DNA Test 700 markers, haplogroup I-FT351547, FTDNA kit #271612
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Nathan:
Please note that the source mentioned here, DAR Vol. 57:478, gives Nathan's wife's given name as Rebecca, not Elizabeth. Torrey's New England Marriages to 1700 suggests that Rebecca is the correct name although the marriage record clearly reads Elizabeth. All the children's birth records call her Rebecca.