Contents |
NATHANIEL BAILEY(JOHN1) was born Abt. 1717 in (possibly) Ballybay, County Monaghan, Ireland, and died Abt. 1780 in Abbeville District, SC. He married JEAN (JANE) UNKNOWN 1743 in Northern Ireland.
Nathaniel and Jean Bailey were married by 1743, had 8 children that we know of: Janet (1745), Joseph (1748), Elizabeth (1749), Isabel (1750), Ann[e] (1751), William (1753), James (1760) and Nathaniel [Jr] (1762). The ages of the children were given in the Council Minutes in Charles Town, SC, at the time the family appeared in court to claim bounty lands as Presbyterian refugees from Ireland according to that Colony's Bounty Act. The Baileys sailed from the port of Belfast, Ireland, on Sept 8, 1767, on the Brig Lord Dunagannon, and arrived at Charleston, SC, Feb 13, 1768. Nathaniel Bailey (age 50) was accompanied by his wife Jean (listed as Jane) (age 45) and eight children. The children were Janet (23), Joseph (20), Elizabeth (18), Isabell (17), Anne (16), William (15), James (8), and Nathaniel (6). This ship was between 180 and 200 tons and on this ship were 139 Irish protestants. Council Journal, SC, [1]
Children of NATHANIEL BAILEY and JEAN UNKNOWN are:
Nathaniel Bailey received a warrant of survey on July 29, 1768, for 250 acres in Granville County on Holidays Creek, a branch of Long Cane. Various family members received additional grants of 100 acres each, including Jannet Bailey, William Bailey, Joseph Bailey, Elizabeth Bailey, Isabell Bailey, and Ann Bailey. The youngest two boys, James and Nathaniel, were apparently not yet old enough to own land and it appears that as head of household, Nathaniel Bailey (Sr.) may have received 50 acres each for each of the two boys as well as 50 acres for his wife, in addition to the hundred he received for himself.
Family members identified in the Lord Dunnaganon passenger records and in the Council Journal were:
Arrival BET 1767 AND 1768 Age: 50/Charles Town, South Carolina[4]
Nathaniel and Jane Bailey and their children sailed on the Brig, the Lord Dunagannon from Belfast Ireland on September 8, 1767. They arrived in Charleston, South Carolina on February 13, 1768.
Family members identified in passenger records were: [5]
The Bailey family were among the protestant refugees from Europe who came to South Carolina on the encouragement of an Act passed by the General Assembly of the Colony of South Carolina on July 25, 1761, called the Bounty Act. This act was a broadening of earlier immigration laws, for the special benefit of these religious refugees. Applicants had to have certificates showing that they were protestants and entitled to receive the benefits allowed by the new Bounty Act. These benefits included a warrant of survey for land in South Carolina, in addition to bounty payments of four pounds and two pounds sterling, according to their respective age, to the owners of the ship for the cost of their ocean passage. The cost of passage was normally a year's wages or become an indentured servant for a period of 3-7 years.Nathaniel and Jane Bailey and their children sailed on the Brig, the Lord Dunagannon from Belfast Ireland on September 8, 1767. They arrived in Charleston, South Carolina on February 13, 1768.
This ship was between 180 and 200 tons and on this ship were 139 Irish protestants. Council Journal, SC, from the book "Protestant Immigrants to SC, 1763-1773 by Jane Revill."Council Journal 34, pages 53-61.Meeting of 13th. February 1768."Ordered that the Secretary do prepare Warrants of Survey accordingly.The following persons presented petitions to his Excellency the Governor setting forth that they were protestants and arrived in this provence in the Brig Lord Dunagannon, Robert Montgomery Master, on the encouragement and Bounty given by the Act of the General Assembly of this Provence passed the 25th July 1761 and therefore prayed to be allowed the same. That the prayers of their petitions were granted and the public Treasurer was ordered to pay the Bountys of four pounds and two pounds sterling according to their respective ages in consideration of their passages to this Province to Messrs Torrans and Ponag in behalf of the owners of the said Brig and the remaining twenty shillings sterling to themselves agreeable to the directions of the said Act."
The South Carolina Council passed an act in 1763 that allowed Scots-Irish Presbyterians (wanted specifically because of their stubbornness and reknowned fighting ability -- apparently conveniently forgetting their tendency toward argumentativeness) who could pay the cost of their passage (4 pounds per adult, and 2 pounds per child) to claim South Carolina country land grants in 100 and 50 acres increments for all family members above age 12.This brought what the Council believed would be a very formidable population of fighting men to live in the back country to defend the low country by defending their own farms and families. Nathaniel Bailey and his family received their lands under this act.Nathaniel Bailey received a warrant of survey on July 29, 1768, for 250 acres in Granville County on Holidays Creek, a branch of Long Cane. Various family members received additional grants of 100 acres each, including Jannet Bailey, William Bailey, Joseph Bailey, Elizabeth Bailey, Isabell Bailey, and Ann Bailey. The youngest two boys, James and Nathaniel, were apparently not yet old enough to own land and it appears that as head of household, Nathaniel Bailey (Sr.) may have received 50 acres each for each of the two boys as well as 50 acres for his wife, in addition to the hundred he received for himself.Family members identified in passenger records were:Nathaniel Bailey age 50Jane Bailey age 45Jannet Bailey age 23Joseph Bailey age 20Elizabeth Bailey age 18Isabell Bailey age 17Ann Bailey age 16William Bailey age 15James Bailey age 8Nathaniel Bailey age 6
The ages of the children were given in the Council Minutes in Charles Town, SC, at the time the family appeared in court to claim bounty lands as Presbyterian refugees from Ireland according to that Colony's Bounty Act.The area that Nathaniel and family settled was known as Ninety Six District and embraced what is known as "the up country" on the Piedmont section.The land was supposedly located on a branch of the Upper Long Cane Creek near the town of Abbeville in the 96 District. Although the name "Holidays Creek" has not survived on any map and so far I have found no record of the land survey for their land, Jean Bailey's Will, dated 1780 and proved 1792, indicates that her plantation was located adjacent to John Bowie's.A map of Abbeville county, dated 1820, shows a Meeting House named "Bowie M.H." to the north of Rocky River, about a mile from the Pendleton County Border and a few miles east of the Savannah River. Although there is no plantation listed in this area under the name of Bowie, it is possible that this was the area of the Bowie plantation and that the Bailey plantation may have been in this area as well. Current maps of the area have a creek that flows into the Long Cane called "Bailey's Creek" that appears to have it's head waters near the town of Due West, SC, which is currently in Anderson County, and which has been part of Abbeville District/County and Pendleton County prior to the area being finally situated in Anderson County. My understanding is that there are still Bailey descendants living on what is most likely the original land This area was to become in a short while a virtual battle ground as the Revolutionary War began.
Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.
Featured Eurovision connections: Nathaniel is 32 degrees from Agnetha Fältskog, 25 degrees from Anni-Frid Synni Reuß, 26 degrees from Corry Brokken, 21 degrees from Céline Dion, 25 degrees from Françoise Dorin, 25 degrees from France Gall, 28 degrees from Lulu Kennedy-Cairns, 25 degrees from Lill-Babs Svensson, 20 degrees from Olivia Newton-John, 32 degrees from Henriette Nanette Paërl, 29 degrees from Annie Schmidt and 19 degrees from Moira Kennedy on our single family tree. Login to find your connection.
There are two other profiles also clearly of the same man. The approved way to eliminate the duplication, while preserving the trail of research, is to merge all of them into the earliest--and most complete--profile, Bailey-2727. I have proposed those other merges separately.
There are two other profiles also clearly of the same man. The approved way to eliminate the duplication, while preserving the trail of research, is to merge all of them into the earliest--and most complete--profile, Bailey-2727. I have proposed those other merges separately.
Two other profiles, also clearly of this same man, also exist: Bailey-25630 and Bailey-24940. They should all be merged into Bailey-2727, since duplicates damage our one WikiTree.