The exact dates and order of birth for Thomas and Mary (Brigham) Benedict's children is unclear. Some sources give Mary's date of birth as December 4, 1650,[1] while others surmise that she was born as late as 1656.
Family
Mary (Benedict) Olmstead was born on 4 December 1650 in Southold, Suffolk, Province of New York, daughter of Thomas Benedict Sr. (<1617–~1690) and Mary (Bridgham) Benedict (<1618–~1719).
Her parents lived in Hassamommock, near Southold, on Long Island, New York.The family removed to Norwalk, in the Colony of Connecticut, around 1665.
Mary (22) married Ensign John Olmstead (23) (born on 30 December 1649 in Hartford, Hartford, Connecticut; son of Richard Olmstead) on 17 July 1673 in Norwalk, Fairfield.[2][3][4] Their known children were:
Mary died on 11 July 1693 in Norwalk, Fairfield, Connecticut Colony, aged 42.[1] Her headstone is no longer visible in the historical cemetery in East Norwalk.
↑The Barbour Collection of Connecticut Town Vital Records - White, Lorraine Cook, ed. (Genealogical Publishing Co., Baltimore, MD, 1994-2002) Vol. Norwalk, Page 11.
↑ Clarence Almon Torrey; New England Marriages Before 1700; Baltimore: Genealogical Publishing Company; 1997
↑ William M. Clements; American Marriages before 1699
William Benedict; Benedict Family Genealogy.
Donald Lines Jacobus, History and Genealogy of the Families of Old Fairfield, CD-Local and Family Histories: CT, 1600's - 1800's, (Produced in collaboration with the Genealogical Publishing Company, 2000), vol 1, p 61.
Ancestral File (R), The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, (Copyright (c) 1987, June 1998, data as of 5 January 1998). Birth: Dec. 4, 1650 Southold Suffolk County, New York, USA. Death: 1693 Norwalk Fairfield County Connecticut, USA
Is Mary your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Mary by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
Mitochondrial DNA test-takers in the direct maternal line:
Benedict-1880 and Benedict-59 are not ready to be merged because: Since this is a pre-1700 profile, it requires the approval of a Volunteer Coordinator to confirim the merger.
Benedict-59 and Benedict-1062 appear to represent the same person because: These two should be merged with a disputed date of birth notice. They do represent the same person, just there is no definitive source and correct date of birth available. Leaving them separate can create confusion.
Family Data Collection - Individual Records U.S., Find A Grave Index, 1600s-Current Web: Connecticut, Find A Grave Index, 1636-2013