Martha (Bomforth) Hartley
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Martha (Bomforth) Hartley (1841 - 1880)

Martha Hartley formerly Bomforth aka Holstein
Born in East Retford, Nottinghamshire, Englandmap
Ancestors ancestors
[sibling(s) unknown]
Wife of — married 1857 in New Zealandmap
Wife of — married 1861 in New Zealandmap
Descendants descendants
Died at age 38 in New Zealandmap
Problems/Questions Profile managers: Jeff Thomas private message [send private message] and Christine Grieder private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 11 Aug 2019
This page has been accessed 138 times.

Biography

Martha Bomforth was born in 1841, at East Retford, Nottinghamshire, England, the daughter of Henry Bomforth and Caroline Shaw.[1]

The extended Bomforth family emigrated aboard the Olympus, departing from Gravesend, Kent, for New Zealand. Martha is listed simply as a 9-month-old female child travelling with parents Henry, 22, a wood turner, and Caroline, 21, and her father's older brother, John, 37, a carpenter, and his family of wife, Harriett, and five children.[2]

She married William a.k.a. Robert Holstein in 1857 [3]
After he passed away in 1860 she married 2nd Charles Hartley in 1861 [4]

She passed away in 1880 age 42 [5]

Sources

  1. England & Wales births, deaths and marriages registrations, General Register Office United Kingdom, Southport, England, HM Passport Office online search Births: Name: BOMFORTH, MARTHA, Mother's Maiden Surname: SHAW, GRO Reference: 1841 S Quarter in EAST RETFORD UNION Volume 15 Page 478
  2. "New Zealand, Archives New Zealand, Passenger Lists, 1839-1973," database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:S3HY-6P5S-PNX : 6 July 2019), Bomforth, 1842; citing ship , Archives New Zealand, Wellington; FHL microfilm 004508784.
  3. http://bdmhistoricalrecords.dia.govt.nz/ NZ Marriage registration 1857/2241
  4. http://bdmhistoricalrecords.dia.govt.nz/ NZ Marriage registration 1861/3296
  5. http://bdmhistoricalrecords.dia.govt.nz/ NZ Death registration 1880/914




Is Martha your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA
No known carriers of Martha's DNA have taken a DNA test.

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 4

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
What is the source for her being born in 1837? The emigration record for her parents show they travelled with a 9-month-old baby girl (unnamed), and the GRO has the birth of Martha Bomforth, mother's maiden surname Shaw, being registered September Quarter 1841 -- which is consistent with the emigration record.
posted by Melanie Paul
Hi Melanie, There are two things I took into account. When she died she was recorded as 42y old, that would bring her birth date to 1838. I found her birth date of 22.8.1837 mentioned on Geni. I could not confirm that. However, it looked more accurate to me than the date of boarding the Olympus as a 9 months old, which would bring her birth date to 1841. I checked her death date, which I could confirm with BDM New Zealand which was 10. June 1880. Geni mentions her death date on 15. June 1880 which is wrong. If you have any way to confirm her birth date please change it on Wikitree. Thanks, Christine
posted by Christine Grieder
Age was very fluid for our ancestors. Either they didn't know for sure, or they didn't care. (My great-grandfather was a different age when he married, than the age on his eldest child's birth record (he got younger!), and at death. I hunted him down, though, and have his correct birth noted.) If you ever check English and/or Scottish census records, the ages fluctuate every 10 years. I have some folk who got younger one time, then aged the next - or some who simply got younger.

I would go with the emigration record plus the GRO birth registration having her born 1841, and write the age at death etc as errors/mistranscriptions, or any number of other reasons. (I would NOT go by whatever is on geni, because I have noted entire families that are just so mixed up - with siblings listed as parents and so on. It is good for a general guide, though, to help get you started on searching for accuracy. Much like find a grave can be used as a guide, but should not be taken as 100% accurate, unless you added the information yourself.) You would then not the age at death as being off by x years.

posted by Melanie Paul
Holstein-351 and Bomforth-10 appear to represent the same person because: They are the same person, Martha was born Bomforth and first married Holstein and then Hartley
posted by Christine Grieder

B  >  Bomforth  |  H  >  Hartley  >  Martha (Bomforth) Hartley

Categories: Retford, Nottinghamshire | Olympus, sailed 16 June 1842