no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

John Irwin (abt. 1780)

John Irwin
Born about [location unknown]
Brother of and
[spouse(s) unknown]
[children unknown]
Died [date unknown] [location unknown]
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Cathi Gross private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 8 Jul 2011
This page has been accessed 432 times.

Contents

Biography

This biography is a rough draft. It was auto-generated by a GEDCOM import and needs to be edited.

Birth

Birth:
Date: ABT 1780
SDATE 1 JUL 1780[1]

User ID

User ID: 60DA76194B052442952729FA9F709C0D1696

Data Changed

Data Changed:
Date: 6 APR 2011

Prior to import, this record was last changed 6 APR 2011.

Note

Note:
When John Irwin wrote his Will in 1808, he did not mention a son John. However, he called himself John Irwin, Sen. It would certainly seem there was a younger John Irwin in the community. Both a John Irwin and a John Irwin, Jr. were listed on the 1806 tax list, assuring me that there were two men of this name, but not necessarily indicating they were father and son.
Carlisle, Cumberland Co PA, there was still a John Irwin in 1800: He had 2 males under 10 and one male age 26-45; 3 females under 10 and one female age 26-45. Given the age, this could be the son, John, if he did not go to Kentucky at the same time as his father.
1810 Cumberland Co PA. John Irvin in Rye Twp. John Irvine in Tyrone Twp.
1820, Cumberland Co PA. Two John Irvines. One John Irwin.
In 1820 in Clermont, Ohio, there was also a John Irvin, Goshen Twp. He had 1m under 10, 1m 16-18, 2 m 16-26, and one male over 45 [or born before 1775 - seems a bit too old]. 3 f under 10, 2f 10-16, and 2 f 26-45. I believe it quite likely this is the following:
A John Irwin of Clermont is listed as having a Rejected Revolutionary Pension for not have served six months. I did find this pension on Heritage Quest and this particular John Irwin [or IRVIN] was still living in 1834 and had served under Capt. John Hughes. If he was younger, than the John Irwin of my research would very likely have been referred to as the "Senior" John Irwin in the area.
Two John IRWINs were found in 1830 in Clermont:
One in New Richmond. 1m 30-40, 1m 60-70. 1f 10-15, 1f 60-70
One in Goshen Twp. 2m -5, 1m 5-10, 1m 10-15, 1m 20-30, 1m 50-60. 1f 5-10, 1f 10-15, 1f 15-20, 1f 40-50
The name is so common and the spellings so varied, I doubt any success in positively identifying a John Irwin, Jr.

Sources

Will Book, Clermont County, Ohio. Copies ordered from Courthouse. Page: Will Book B. Pp.244-249.

  1. Source: #S532 Page: Gedcom File 15 Feb 2000. TMPLT FIELD Name: Page VALUE Gedcom File 15 Feb 2000.




Is John your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with John by comparing test results with other carriers of his ancestors' Y-chromosome or mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with John:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 2

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Irwin-2505 and Irwin-345 do not represent the same person because: These two are NOT the same. Married different wives in different countries!
posted by [Living Adamson]
Irwin-1938 and Irwin-345 do not represent the same person because: There is not enough information to assume a match. The name is very common.
posted by [Living Adamson]

I  >  Irwin  >  John Irwin