no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Mary (Unknown) Batte (bef. 1645 - bef. 1695)

Mary Batte formerly [surname unknown]
Born before [location unknown]
Daughter of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Wife of — married [date unknown] [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Died before at about age 50 in Virginiamap
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Magna Carta Project WikiTree private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 19 Apr 2022
This page has been accessed 339 times.
Project Logo with "No MC Trail” and international No symbol
No Magna Carta Trail
This profile does not meet the requirements of the Magna Carta project but is managed by the project to ensure the integrity of the profiles that do. See text for details.
Join: Magna Carta Project
Discuss: magna_carta

Please do not merge with Mary Randolph or Mary Jennings: see research notes.

Contents

Biography

Mary, whose family origins are unknown and whose birth date is a guesstimate, was the wife of Thomas Batte. They had five children:[1][2]

They had five children:[1][2]

  • Thomas (1662-1691)[3]
  • Mary, who married Peter Jones[3][4]
  • Amy[3]
  • Sarah, who probably married John Evans[3] after 6 June 1695 - she is referred to as Sarah Batte in her father's will signed on that date[4]
  • Martha, who married Abraham Jones, the Rev. John Bannister and Stephen Cocke[4][5]

On 6 August 1671 Mary was one of the sponsors for the baptism of Judith Randolph, daughter of Henry and Judith Randolph, who was born at Appamatox, Virginia.[6]

Mary is not named in her husband’s 1695 will[7] so she presumably died before then.

1696 Will of Husband

Thomas Batte Sr. 1696 Charles City County Will: In the name of God Amen I Thomas Batte being Weake in body but of sound and perfect memory Thanks be to Almighty God doe make and ordaine this my last will testament in maner and forme as followeth Item I bequeath my sole to god that gave it my body to be buried at ye decrestion of my Execurs hereafter named in sure and certain hope through Jesus Christ of A joyfull Resurrection at ye last day Item I give and bequeath unto my daufhter Martha Cock one hundred thirty and five Acres of Land Joyning upon ye line of ye brick house Land with all ye apertenances therunto belonging to hir and hir heirs forever Item I give and bequeath unto my dauftter Sarah Batte all ye Remainder of my Land whatever with all ye apertenances therunto belonging Joyning uppon ye Line of my daufter Martha Cock to hir and hir heirs forever Item I give & bequeath unto martha Batte dafter of my son Tho: Batt decd twelve pence sterling Item I give & bequeath unto my dafter Mary Jones ten shillings Item I give & bequeath unto my daughter Sarah Batt all ye rest of personall Estate whatsever after all my debts is fully satisfied and pd and I doe herby will make constitue and apoynt Peter Jones full hole and sole Executor of this my last will and testamt in Wittness wherof I have herunto sett my hand and seale ye six day of June 1695 Tho: Butte seale Signed sealed in pnce of George Archer William his [mark] + mark Travler John his [mark] W mark Eginton Proved in Court by the oaths of Geo: Archer & John Eginton Xbr 3 1696 Test. James Minge Cl Cur

Research Notes

WikiTree has previously shown two Marys as wives of Thomas Batte:

There is no good evidence to identify the family name of Thomas's wife. As noted above, Mary was a sponsor at the baptism of Judith Randolph, but that does not demonstrate that she was herself a member of the Randolph family. The other sponsor was Amy (Butler) Beville - named Amy Bedill in an 1895 article in the William and Mary Quarterly[6] - who was not a Randolph.

Sources

  1. 1.0 1.1 Douglas Richardson. Magna Carta Ancestry: A Study in Colonial and Medieval Families, 4 vols, ed. Kimball G. Everingham, 2nd edition (Salt Lake City: the author, 2011), Vol. III, p. 123, MALLORY 14.iii.b, Google Books
  2. 2.0 2.1 Douglas Richardson. Royal Ancestry: A Study in Colonial and Medieval Families, 5 vols, ed. Kimball G. Everingham (Salt Lake City: the author, 2013), Vol. II, p. 314, CORNWALL 19.ii
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 3.3 William Clayton Torrence. Henrico County: Virginia: Beginnings of Its Families: Part III in 'The William and Mary Quarterly', Vol. 24, No. 4 (April 1916), p. 269, JSTOR - account (free) required
  4. 4.0 4.1 4.2 Transcript of will : Library of Virginia, Digital Collections, http://digitool1.lva.lib.va.us:8881/R/-?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=1289053 Pages 100-199, image 21 of 100 (may not be viewable on mobile devices)
  5. Virginia Webb Cocke. Cocke and Cousins, Vol. II, printed for the author in 1974, p. 3, Familysearch (image page 17)
  6. 6.0 6.1 Descendants of Henry Randolph in The William and Mary Quarterly, Vol. 4, No. 2, 1895, p. 126, Hathi Trust
  7. Transcript of will : Library of Virginia, Digital Collections, http://digitool1.lva.lib.va.us:8881/R/-?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=1289053 Pages 100-199, image 21 of 100 (may not be viewable on mobile devices)
  8. See for instance this tree on Ancestry, accessed 21 March 2022

See also:

Acknowledgements

Magna Carta Project

Mary is not in an identified Magna Carta trail but she was wife of a Magna Carta Project Gateway. Her profile is managed by the Magna Carta Project because she is often given a last name without good sourcing: see the research notes.





Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Mary: Have you taken a test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.


Comments: 23

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
posted by John C. Fox
edited by John C. Fox
Thomas Batte is referred to as a "kinsman" in the will of Colonel John Farrar. See https://archive.org/details/virginiamagazine08bruc/page/426/mode/2up?q=batte. That suggests it may have been Thomas, not his wife Mary, who was related by blood to John Farrar.
posted by Michael Cayley
edited by Michael Cayley
Thanks for sharing the link of that entire will!

I'm not seeing the "cozen" Thomas Batte. Maybe bad eyes. Can you give that exact passage, please?

Also, "Mrs. Amy Kent" is the woman who became "Mrs. Essex Bevill" . I think that lends more weight to the theory that Thomas Batte Sr. was likely her other husband, rather than the Bott fellow..

posted by John C. Fox
Sorry, it looks as if I misread the will. Too many Thomases. Unless I have missed something, it does not specify a relationship. What it does say is that John Farrar left the residue of his moveable property (which appears to be mainly livestock) at Appomattock to the Battes "in consideration of ye great trouble and pains they have taken w'th me in this, my last sickness".

The main residue of his estate he left to Farrar kinsmen.

posted by Michael Cayley
edited by Michael Cayley
Thanks. Yeah I doubt we will ever get a document that says Mary who married Thomas Batt Sr. was the daughter of John Browne, But this is pretty decent evidence that a strong relationship existed between John Farrar and possibly Mary, wife of Thomas. And them just being kind to an old dying man is a stretch, in my opinion.

I think this also gives more credence to this connection: Temperance (Browne) Batte (abt.1672-)

posted by John C. Fox
”I think this also gives more credence to this connection: Temperance https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Browne-1337.”

Temperance’s profile does not help. What it says is that Temperance, who was daughter-in-law of Mary and her husband Thomas Batte, married, as her second husband, Colonel John Farrar's nephew, John Farrar. It does not tell us anything about whether Colonel John Farrar was related to Mary or Thomas Batte Senior. Temperance is shown as daughter of John and Sarah Browne, but that does not give any evidence that her mother-in-law Mary, wife of Thomas Batte Senior, was a Browne. So it doesn’t give any assistance with establishing Mary’s origins.

"And them just being kind to an old dying man is a stretch, in my opinion."… I see no reason to disbelieve what is said in Colonel John Farrar’s will about the Battes helping him in his final illness. It is not unusual for someone to make bequests to people who have helped to look after them. Again, this does not tell us whether Colonel John Farrar was related to Mary or her husband. They are likely to have been neighbours: Thomas Batte senior held quite extensive property in the Appotomack area and Colonel John Farrar bought 200 acres of it.

[edited for a minor slip and for clarity]

posted by Michael Cayley
edited by Michael Cayley
I do not believe Thomas Batte Sr can be one of the husbands of Amy, widow of Essex Beville. There appears to be nothing in John Farrar’s will which supports this suggestion. For one piece of evidence which indicates pretty clearly that the suggestion is wrong, see the research notes on Thomas's profile. There is the February 1689 deed which refers to Thomas Botte, his wife Amy, and Thomas Batte Senior, clearly showing that Thomas Botte husband of Amy was not Thomas Batte senior. See also the profile of Thomas Bott-696 for further evidence, including a June 1690 deed which again refers to Thomas Botte and Amy his wife and Thomas Batte Senior - again, Thomas Batte Senior is not the husband of Amy.
posted by Michael Cayley
edited by Michael Cayley
This "1689 deed which refers to Thomas Botte, his wife Amy, and Thomas Batte Senior, clearly showing that Thomas Botte husband of Amy was not Thomas Batte senior. " I believe is a transposition error. It has been the exact opposite in other deeds or transactions stating Thomas Batte Sr.. and not Thomas Botts.

And I think the closer family relationships that I've been showing gives the Thomas Batte Sr. husband theory more weight.

posted by John C. Fox
edited by John C. Fox
What basis is there for suggesting a transposition error in two deeds? Very strong evidence will be needed. If all you have found is Thomas Botte and Thomas Batte senior being named in a different order in other documents, that is no reason to believe it was Thomas Batte Senior who married Amy. If you can find a document which explicitly refers to Thomas Batte Senior as husband of Amy, then that can be looked at.
posted by Michael Cayley
edited by Michael Cayley
Ok, I'll dig the Thomas Batte Sr.\Amy Butler references up again.
posted by John C. Fox
By the way, Amy (Butler) Beville was widow of Essex Beville when she married Henry Kent: Henry was her second husband, not her prior husband. Essex Beville died before February 1683 when his will was proved. John Farrar’s will which refers to her as Amy Kent was dated 4 March 1684/5.
posted by Michael Cayley
Yes, and I believe Thamos Batte Sr. may have been the 3rd and last.
posted by John C. Fox
This discussion of which Thomas married Amy, widow of Essex Beville and Henry Kent does not really belong in comments on this profile. John, if you wish to pursue this further, I suggest you ask a question in G2G. For me at the moment, the evidence is clearcut that Amy's third husband was not Thomas Batte Senior.
posted by Michael Cayley
edited by Michael Cayley
Seems like there is some good info out there. The puzzle just needs to be put together.

Judith, daughter of Henry & Judith, born at Appam: 29 Jul 1671 baptized y* 6tb of August in ye parsh church by Mr. Bichd Morris - Sponsors Wm Soane Mrs Mary Batte Mrs Amy Bedill.

27 Mar 1676 Essex Beville and Thomas Webster agree to line between Mentions Old Town Cr., cart path from George Archer’s to the mill, land formerly in occupation of Henry Crowder and Godfrey Ragsdale’s land; wit: Simon Tildesley and Nich. Dison; signed Thomas Webster; presented in court by Thomas Batte, who married executrix of Essex Beville, decd. rec. 1 June 1689 (Will and Deed Book 1688-1697, p. 70)

posted by John C. Fox
edited by John C. Fox
William's father, Henry Soane, received a grant of land in Virginia which was recorded in 1651 for transport of 6 persons: Henry Soane, Sr. (self), Henry Soane, Jr., Judith Soane, Sr. (wife), Judith Soane, Jr., John Soane, and Elizabeth Soane.[6] The only children born in England were Henry Soane, Jr., Judith Soane, Jr., John Soane, and Elizabeth Soane. William must have been born after their arrival in Henrico County, Virginia. Strutton-11 19:23, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Here's my theory: William, Mary, and Amy Soane were the Virginia born children of Henry Soane and Judith Fuller.

posted by John C. Fox
Thanks, John. Is it possible for you to give weblinks for the sources you have found? As you recognise, they do not give us reliable evidence on Mary's family origins. We need to avoid surmise.
posted by Michael Cayley
To add that if the Essex Beville referred to is Essex Beville-27 who died in 1682, his will names his wife Amy, not Mary. See Benjamin B Weisigner, Colonial Wills of Henrico County, Virginia: 1654-1737, 1976, image on Familysearch. Amy has a profie here. According to Douglas Richardson, after Essex Beville's death she married Henry Kent who died in 1686 and then, before 26 September 1688, Thomas Bott/Botte. I am not yet aware of any good evidence that she married the Thomas Batte of this profile - but if you find any, please tell me.
posted by Michael Cayley
Yes, Amy was Essex Beville's wife when he died. She was the 2nd (or 3rd) wife of Thomas Batte.

" then, before 26 September 1688, Thomas Bott/Botte" This "Thomas Bott" who eventually married Amy is almost certainly the same Thomas Batte who initially married Mary.

Iow, "married executrix of Essex Beville" is AMY Beville. The way I phrased it was probably confusing.

posted by John C. Fox
edited by John C. Fox
I am afraid we need reliable evidence before the suggestion that Amy married Thomas Batte, husband of Mary, can be accepted. It may be worth noting that Thomas's 1695 will makes no mention of any wife.
posted by Michael Cayley
edited by Michael Cayley
See my separate comment below. The evidence seems to me fairly strong that Amy's husband Thomas Botte was not the Thomas Batte who married Mary.
posted by Michael Cayley
Thanks Michael. Here are the web links.

1.) "Judith, daughter of Henry & Judith, born at Appam: 29 Jul 1671 baptized y* 6tb of August in ye parsh church by Mr. Bichd Morris - Sponsors Wm Soane Mrs Mary Batte Mrs Amy Bedill." The William and Mary College Quarterly Historical Magazine, vol. 4, no. 2, 1895, pp. 125–27. JSTOR, https://doi.org/10.2307/1915057. Accessed 12 Apr. 2024.

2.) "27 Mar 1676 Essex Beville and Thomas Webster agree to line between Mentions Old Town Cr., cart path from George Archer’s to the mill, land formerly in occupation of Henry Crowder and Godfrey Ragsdale’s land; wit: Simon Tildesley and Nich. Dison; signed Thomas Webster; presented in court by Thomas Batte, who married executrix of Essex Beville, decd. rec. 1 June 1689 (Will and Deed Book 1688-1697, p. 70)" https://liveasfreepeople.com/2017/02/28/early-bevilles-of-four-virginia-counties/ Early Bevilles of Four Virginia Counties,

3.) "William's father, Henry Soane, received a grant of land in Virginia which was recorded in 1651 for transport of 6 persons: Henry Soane, Sr. (self), Henry Soane, Jr., Judith Soane, Sr. (wife), Judith Soane, Jr., John Soane, and Elizabeth Soane.[6] The only children born in England were Henry Soane, Jr., Judith Soane, Jr., John Soane, and Elizabeth Soane. William must have been born after their arrival in Henrico County" https://archive.org/details/speakersclerksof00kukl_0/page/60/mode/2up?q=soane

posted by John C. Fox
edited by John C. Fox
Thanks again, John. The second of these sources suggests to me that Thomas, husband of Mary, did not marry Essex Beville's widow Amy. It quotes a record said to be of 28 February 1689. This reads: "There was an escheat grant to Thomas Botte and Amy his wife and Thomas Batte, Sr. of 400 acres in the Old Town in Appomattox R. for valuable consideration, makes over his part to John Beville; wit: Wm. Downes, Essex Beville; signed Thos. Bott; 2 June 1690 (Will and Deed Book 1688-1697, p. 123)". Thomas Batte Senior is likely to be Mary's husband, referred to as Senior because he had a son of the same name.

The Thomas Botte who married Amy is probably Thomas Bott-696, who was 30 in 1686 - see his profile for further information. This Thomas has no reliably evidenced parents at the moment. He appears to be different from Thomas Batte-72, son of Mary (Unknown) and her husband Thomas Batte: Thomas Batte-72 is said to have married Temperance Browne before 2 April 1688, with Temperance surviving him - if this information is right, then, unless he committed bigamy, he cannot be the Thomas Botte who was recorded as husband of Amy, widow of Essex Beville, in 1689.

The profile of Thomas Bott-696 includes a statement "It should be noted there was a BOTT family as well as a BATT family (with different spelling variations of each) in the records of Henrico County, Virginia."

posted by Michael Cayley
edited by Michael Cayley
Thanks. I'll do the research required to get to the bottom of it. At first blush, many seem to have conflated people and used old and unreliable sources, But I may be wrong.
posted by John C. Fox

Featured Asian and Pacific Islander connections: Mary is 22 degrees from 今上 天皇, 20 degrees from Adrienne Clarkson, 21 degrees from Dwight Heine, 23 degrees from Dwayne Johnson, 21 degrees from Tupua Tamasese Lealofioaana, 16 degrees from Stacey Milbern, 19 degrees from Sono Osato, 30 degrees from 乾隆 愛新覺羅, 17 degrees from Ravi Shankar, 20 degrees from Taika Waititi, 22 degrees from Penny Wong and 10 degrees from Chang Bunker on our single family tree. Login to see how you relate to 33 million family members.

[Do you know Mary's family name?]  |  B  >  Batte  >  Mary (Unknown) Batte