no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

George (Redmond) Redman Sr (abt. 1789 - 1843)

George Redman Sr formerly Redmond
Born about in Charlotte County, Virginia, United Statesmap
Son of [father unknown] and [mother unknown]
[sibling(s) unknown]
Husband of — married 29 Jun 1835 in Laurel, Kentucky, United Statesmap
Descendants descendants
Died at about age 54 in Clay County, Kentuckymap
Problems/Questions Profile managers: Robin White private message [send private message] and Jennifer Caldwell private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 7 Feb 2021
This page has been accessed 443 times.

Biography

George was born in 1789. He died in 1843. [1]

Sources

  1. Find a Grave, database and images (accessed February 14, 2024), memorial page for George Redman Sr. (Jun 1789–8 Sep 1843), Find A Grave: Memorial #124010295, citing Providence Baptist Church Cemetery, Bush, Laurel County, Kentucky, USA; maintained by sympatico (contributor 47285538), Burial Details Unknown.
  • "Kentucky, County Marriages, 1797-1954," database with images, FamilySearch (https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:Q28L-KJQY : 22 July 2021), George Redmund and Leanna Murry, 29 Jun 1835; citing Marriage, Laurel, Kentucky, United States, various county clerks and county courts, Kentucky; FHL microfilm 965,809.

Acknowledgements

Profile created by Robin White through the import of LizAnc.ged on Jan 10, 2018.





Is George your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with George by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with George:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 13

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Redmon-338 and Redman-1529 appear to represent the same person because: they share the exact same vital statistics. The difference in the spelling of surnames needs to be rectified.
posted on Redman-1529 (merged) by Linda (Johnson) Leslie
edited by Linda (Johnson) Leslie
Redman-1529 and Redmond-1636 are not ready to be merged because: More sources needed
posted by Maggie N.
Hello, Maggie,

I've added a couple more photographic sources that corroborate the document of the "Estate Closing of Thomas Redman," which states that George Redman is the spouse of both Nancy Brizendine and Keziah Ford. One photo enumerates the daughters of George Redman with Keziah Ford, one of who is Martha Jane, listed on Wikitree. The other is a "Guardian Accounting of the Redman Sisters," in which Keziah Ford also is listed. Do those sources help with the merge?

Thanks!

Linda

posted by Linda (Johnson) Leslie
Redman-1529 and Redmond-1636 do not represent the same person because: Not much in common
posted by Neal Parker
Redmond-1636 and Redman-1529 appear to represent the same person because: they share the exact same vital statistics, the same spouses, Nancy Brizendine and Keziah Ford, and use the same FindAGrave.com source.
posted by Linda (Johnson) Leslie
Redman-1529 and Redmond-1636 do not represent the same person because: Appear similar but still too many discrepancies.
posted by Linda (Johnson) Leslie
Redman-1529 and Redmond-1636 appear to represent the same person because: more sources have been provided to prove the marriage relationships of George Redmond/Redman.
posted by Linda (Johnson) Leslie
Which spelling are we using for LNAB and what support do we have for that? We need to resolve that question before merging.
posted by William Foster Jr
Hello, William,

First, congratulations on reaching 100,000+G2G points!

As for George Redmond/Redman, I've found sources that spell the surname as "Redmond" when it originates from England and "Redmon" when it comes from Scotland. In the United States, the surname spelling often changes to "Redman." My vote is for "Redmond" since the name originated in the British Isles, but I'd also include "Redman" as a secondary surname.

posted by Linda (Johnson) Leslie
Hello Linda,

Since he is purported to be born in England, we should use the england spelling of "Redmond" lacking any evidence otherwise. I think we are confident he was not born in America, therefore the American spelling is not applicable.

-William

posted by William Foster Jr
I had this profile conflated in my head, he is listed as born in United States, so I'd go with "Redman" unless we have evidence to the contrary. Best would be if we had a record from around when he was born giving the spelling used by the family. E.g., a birth record for him or a land record for his father around the time of his birth.
posted by William Foster Jr
Redmond-1636 and Redman-1529 are not ready to be merged because: Appear similar but still too many discrepancies
posted on Redman-1529 (merged) by Jennifer Caldwell
Redmond-1636 and Redman-1529 appear to represent the same person because: the birth dates are similar, and the marriage date is exactly the same, although for different spouses. In the biography section, one source indicates that the marriage date is for the first wife, Nancy Brizendine, which syncs with the other profile. Also, the different surnames need to be rectified.
posted on Redman-1529 (merged) by Linda (Johnson) Leslie

R  >  Redmond  |  R  >  Redman  >  George (Redmond) Redman Sr