no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Mary (Slocum) Corey (1738)

Mary Corey formerly Slocum
Born in Tiverton, Newport County, Rhode Islandmap
Ancestors ancestors
Wife of — married 16 Dec 1756 [location unknown]
Descendants descendants
Died [date unknown] in Tiverton, Newport, Rhode Islandmap
Problems/Questions Profile managers: Earl Cory private message [send private message] and Steven C Slocum private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 11 Sep 2010
This page has been accessed 586 times.

Biography

note: marriage source lists Mary Slocum marrying Caleb Cory 16 Dec 1756 NOT Mary Seabury as claimed on the profile of Mary Seabury and Caleb Cory.

Descendents of Thomas Durfee p 39 lists Mary Slocum as the second wife of Caleb Corey. Children listed are William, Wbenezer, Barhseheba, Mary, Abigail, Deliverance, Seabury, Sarah, from 1759 to 1784.

source for death not yet found.

Slocum "Fifth Generation. 73
62. i. Charles, b 19 Feb 1729; mar. Sarah Allen; d. April 1777.
63. ii. Abraham, born 29 June, 1730; married Abigail Smith.
iii. Ebenezer, b. 9 May, 1732, in Dartmouth, Mass.; died young.
iv. Desire, botn 23 Feb, 1734; was mar. with William Cook of Portsmouth, R. I., 8 June, 1755, by william Hale, J. P.
64. v. Samuel, born 4 Nov 1736; mar. Ruth Hall for 2d wife.
vi. Mary, born 1 Oct 1738; was married with Caleb Cory of Portsmouth, R. I., 16 Dec 1756, by william Anthony, J. P. They had children, Bathsheba and William.
65. vii. David, b 23 Sept., 1740; mar. Phebe Manchester; d. 1818
viii. Eliezer, born 7 May 1742; married Thankful -----, and had one daughter living in 1781. He resided in Hampshire County, Massachusets, in 1777, in which year he was a soldier in the Continental Army under Captain John Hamilton and Col. John Moseley for the Defense of Newport;* he also served under Col. Nathan Sparrowhawk at Saratoga. He afterwards removed to New Brunswick, with his nephew Ebenezer Slocum (sketch No. 132), arriving at St. John by the ship Union in 1783. He was a large muscular man and possessed strength of a giant.
66. ix. Elijah, b. 23 June 1744; mar. Comfort -----, in Tiverton.
x. Stephen, born 24 June 1746; mar. Elizabeth Fisher (?).
67. xi. Edward, born 1748; mar. ------------- -------------; died about 1822.
xii. Ebenezer, born 26 May, 1750; married, 4 June 1778, widow Rebecca (Burgess?) Briggs of Dartmought, Mass. and had a child Mary. He was Lieutenant in the Second Company of Tiverton soldiers in 1775 and '76, and member of Rhode Island Regiment in 1781."
Source: #S73

Mary was born about 1740.

Sources


  • "Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1626-2001," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:Q29G-TVW8 : 18 February 2020), Mary Slocum, 01 Oct 1738; citing Birth, Dartmouth, Bristol, Massachusetts, United States, Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth, Boston; FHL microfilm 007010711.



https://archive.org/details/descendantsoftho00lcreed/page/38/mode/2up

Acknowledgements

  • This person was created through the import of dyermaeettaaug2010.ged on 11 September 2010.
  • Slocum-726 was created by Steven C Slocum through the import of Steven Slocum family tree.ged on Jul 29, 2015.
  • Al B. Cory, Corys of America, 2nd Edition




Is Mary your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Mary by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Mary:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 6

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Seabury-233 and Slocum-75 appear to represent the same person because: this might do it
Slocum-75 and Seabury-233 do not represent the same person because: trying to reverse
posted on Seabury-233 (merged) by Mary Susan Hall (1949-2023)
Slocum-75 and Seabury-233 appear to represent the same person because: The direction is selected at the time of the merge. Yes Seabury into Slocum
posted on Seabury-233 (merged) by Mary Susan Hall (1949-2023)
Slocum-75 and Seabury-233 do not represent the same person because: This merge should take place but opposite. Merge Seabury into Slocum.
posted on Seabury-233 (merged) by Earl Cory
Slocum-75 and Seabury-233 appear to represent the same person because: Should be Slocum according to sources. The children on Mary Seabury belong to Mary Slocum. Seabury should merged into Slocum.
posted on Seabury-233 (merged) by Mary Susan Hall (1949-2023)
Slocum-75 and Slocum-726 appear to represent the same person because: same name, birth date birth and death locations
posted on Slocum-726 (merged) by Mary Susan Hall (1949-2023)

S  >  Slocum  |  C  >  Corey  >  Mary (Slocum) Corey