"United States Census, 1850," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:M65S-QL6 : 12 April 2016), James Williams, Floyd county, Floyd, Kentucky, United States; citing family 56, NARA microfilm publication M432 (Washington, D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.).
"United States Census, 1870," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MXWF-SNG : 12 April 2016), James Williams, Kentucky, United States; citing p. 24, family 166, NARA microfilm publication M593 (Washington D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.); FHL microfilm 545,976.
"United States Census, 1880," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MCZQ-SL3 : 12 August 2017), James Williams, Barnetts Creek, Johnson, Kentucky, United States; citing enumeration district ED 45, sheet 163A, NARA microfilm publication T9 (Washington D.C.: National Archives and Records Administration, n.d.), roll 0425; FHL microfilm 1,254,425.
Paternal and maternal relationships for Alexander Williams are confirmed by a triangulated group on GEDmatch consisting of Kenneth Williams GEDmatch CH2415663, paternal 1st cousin Sylvia GEDmatch UZ8570969 and Daniel Hamilton GEDmatch T10584. They share from 10.4 to 15.6 cM on Chromosome 4. Their most-recent common ancestors are their third great-grandparents John James Williams and Frances Lane.
Is James your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with James by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA.
Y-chromosome DNA test-takers in his direct paternal line on WikiTree:
There are two problems with your DNA confirmation statement using triangulation:
1) Two of your test takers are first cousins, not distant cousins. For triangulation you need to have three or more distant cousins who share the same segment of DNA. Please review the requirements for triangulation here: https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Help:Triangulation
2) If you did have valid triangulation, you would only be able to confirm back to, but not including the relationships to the ancestral couple. See this information:https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Help:Triangulation#Do_you_include_the_MRCA.3F
I've changed the 'confirmed with DNA' entries to 'confident'. Please add the appropriate documentation before changing them back to 'confirmed with DNA'. Thanks!
1) Two of your test takers are first cousins, not distant cousins. For triangulation you need to have three or more distant cousins who share the same segment of DNA. Please review the requirements for triangulation here: https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Help:Triangulation 2) If you did have valid triangulation, you would only be able to confirm back to, but not including the relationships to the ancestral couple. See this information:https://www.wikitree.com/wiki/Help:Triangulation#Do_you_include_the_MRCA.3F
I've changed the 'confirmed with DNA' entries to 'confident'. Please add the appropriate documentation before changing them back to 'confirmed with DNA'. Thanks!