no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Phillip Delph (1775)

Phillip Delph
Born in Grayson, Virginiamap
Ancestors ancestors
[spouse(s) unknown]
[children unknown]
Died [date unknown] [location unknown]
Problems/Questions Profile manager: Seán Donovan private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 26 May 2016
This page has been accessed 201 times.
This profile lacks source information. Please add sources that support the facts.

Biography

According to Laura Lee Moncrief's book DELPH, Peter Jr. died 1849 (as noted in the 1850 Mortality schedule for Grayson County) He married Elizabeth "Beze" HACKLER April 13, 1794 in Grayson. Either the wife listed above is incorrect or this is likely not the son of Peter & Eveline. Peter & Elizabeth were in Ashe County NC on the 1800. Grayson & Ashe are nearly inseparable locations for many of these families--are you sure of Sarah's 1795 birth in Iredell County NC......???

Phillip Delph. [1]

Born 1775 Grayson, Virginia, USA. [2]

Sources

  1. Source: #S00010 Database online. Record for Peter Delph
  2. Source: #S00010 Database online. Record for Peter Delph
  • Laura Lee Moncrief's book DELPH, quotes and has copies of Sources.
  • Source: S00010 Ancestry.com Public Member Trees Publication: Name: The Generations Network, Inc.; Location: Provo, UT, USA; Date: 2006; Repository: #R00001
  • Repository: R00001 www.ancestry.com




Is Phillip your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message the profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Phillip by comparing test results with other carriers of his ancestors' Y-chromosome or mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Phillip:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 3

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Delp-67 and Delph-93 appear to represent the same person because: appear to be same person
Delph-91 and Delp-67 do not represent the same person because: there are too many duplicate children... sorry meant to do the 2 Peters and yes there are 2 Phillips as well.
posted by Carole Taylor
Delph-91 and Delp-67 appear to represent the same person because: Believe they are one/same Thank you Carole
posted by Carole Taylor

Rejected matches › Peter Delph (abt.1773-abt.1849)

D  >  Delph  >  Phillip Delph

Categories: Unsourced Profiles