John, son of "Henry and Eliz Royall" was born 23 October 1729, Bristol Parish, Virginia.[1] He passed away in 1810 Halifax, Virginia or Surry County, North Carolina.
Notes from Find a Grave [2]:
John Royal, Sr. (son of Henry Royall and Elizabeth Liege) was born 1729 in Bristol Parish, Henrico County, Virginia, and died January 12, 1810 in Surry County, North Carolina.
Parents Henry Royall (son of Joseph Royall, Jr. and Mary) was born 1686, and died 1747. He married Elizabeth Liege.
Children of Henry Royall and Elizabeth Liege are:
John Royal, Sr., b. 1729, Bristol Parish, Henrico County, Virginia, d. January 12, 1810, Surry County, North Carolina.
Joseph Royal, b. 1719, d. 1754.
Francis Royal, b. January 10, 1720/21.
William Royal, b. 1720.
John was born in 1729. John Royal ... He passed away in 1810. [3]
This profile is a collaborative work-in-progress. Can you contribute information or sources?
↑ First-hand information as remembered by James Miles, Tuesday, June 24, 2014. Replace this citation if there is another source.
Yates Publishing. U.S. and International Marriage Records, 1560-1900 [database on-line]. Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com Operations Inc, 2004. Source number: 320.000; Source type: Electronic Database; Number of Pages: 1; Submitter Code: LCW. Name: John Royall Gender: Male Birth Place: VA Birth Year: 1725 Spouse Name: Susanna Bates Spouse Birth Place: VA Marriage Year: 1748 Marriage State: VA
WikiTree profile Royall-60 created through the import of Foulks.ged on Jan 27, 2012 by Angela Montgomery
Is John your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with John by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with John:
Royall-393 and Royal-214 appear to represent the same person because: Royall (two ll's) usually seen, but... do we have any sources to support the children attached to these two?
Royall-60 and Royal-315 appear to represent the same person because: same name, same wife. Without sources it is difficult to know which is the correct birth, and the correct spelling of the surname. Please add your sources to Wikitree.
Royall-393 and Royal-214 appear to represent the same person because: Royall (two ll's) usually seen, but... do we have any sources to support the children attached to these two?
edited by Liz (Noland) Shifflett
See will attached to daughter Sarah.