Jacoba Vanderveer, also known as Jacoba Dominicus, was baptized on 29 April 1686 at Old First Dutch Reformed Church, Breuckelen (Brooklyn), Kings Co., Long Island, New York; witnesses: Daniel Polhemus, Catharijna Polhemus. Her parents were Cornelis VanderveerTryntje de Mandeville
Jacoba married Jan Willemszen Van Kouwenhoven, son of Willem Gerritse and Jannetje Monfoort, circa 1704. [1]
Source: S1661609671 Repository: #R1650681338 Ancestry Family Trees Publication: Online publication - Provo, UT, USA: Ancestry.com. Original data: Family Tree files submitted by Ancestry members. Ancestry Family Tree https://www.ancestry.com/family-tree/tree/112943613/family. Repository: R1650681338 Ancestry.com
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, Ancestral File : Ancestral File Number: 8W6B-3M, Ancestral File Number: S92L-3M, Ancestral File Number: H2GG-NG
Acknowledgments
This person was created through the import of grant2.ged on 07 February 2011.
This person was created through the import of grant2.ged on 07 February 2011.
Profile by JoAnn Allen, Thursday, August 14, 2014.
This profile is a collaborative work-in-progress. Can you contribute information or sources?
Is Jacoba your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Jacoba by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Jacoba:
Vandeveer-23 and Van Der Veer-42 appear to represent the same person because: Same husband, appears to be same son. Please consider merging into all details on Van Der Veer- 42. Thanks for reviewing.
Van Der Veer-42 and Vanderveer-3 appear to represent the same person because: Upon researching the sources, there is no source for a male Jacob born in this year. Sources appear to confuse this femal Jacoba with a male Jacobus Vanderveer born 1633 (cannot be a child in this family, father would have been 10 year old)
Added the family Vanderveer (info to the BIO) , it looks like there was no Jacobus , at least not according the info I found at the Brouwer database and the van der Veer genealogy site.
But there are three children mentioned that possibly died at an early age, so maybe we should just look at it some more and leave this one in (so not merge him with his sister ?) He could very well have been a son that died at infancy ? Or maybe these dates added here are correct and they were twins ? He died 10 years of age so that's also quite young.
Greets ,
Bea
In that case and if you think that's a better option as well, you can of course reject the match again, it seems needless to merge him into one of the others.
I noticed that you imported this pre-1700 ancestor from a GEDCOM file.
Could you please take a few moments to review the Pre-1700 Quiz and the explanations about the sort of sources WikiTree is looking for, as well as this very handy list of sources which are considered "not quite good enough" before you add any more pre-1700 profiles with an ancestry tree as only source?
Thank you,
Debi
Added the family Vanderveer (info to the BIO) , it looks like there was no Jacobus , at least not according the info I found at the Brouwer database and the van der Veer genealogy site.
But there are three children mentioned that possibly died at an early age, so maybe we should just look at it some more and leave this one in (so not merge him with his sister ?) He could very well have been a son that died at infancy ? Or maybe these dates added here are correct and they were twins ? He died 10 years of age so that's also quite young.
Greets , Bea
In that case and if you think that's a better option as well, you can of course reject the match again, it seems needless to merge him into one of the others.