no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Samuel Wilbore (1692 - 1752)

Samuel Wilbore
Born in Little Compton, Bristol, Massachusetts Baymap
Ancestors ancestors
Husband of — married 24 Dec 1713 in Little Compton, Newport, Rhode Islandmap
Descendants descendants
Died at age 59 in Little Compton, Newport, Rhode Islandmap
Problems/Questions Profile managers: Eunice Pender private message [send private message] and Darcey Zumwalt private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 17 Dec 2013
This page has been accessed 1,312 times.

Contents

Biography

Samuel was born in 1692. He was the son of Samuel Wilbore and Mary Potter. He passed away in 1752.

Marriage

Samuel and Elizabeth were married at Little Compton, Bristol County, Massachusetts Bay Colony, now Newport County, Rhode Island, on December 24, 1713, by Richard Billings, Justice.[1].

Children

Children of Samuel and Elizabeth born Little Compton:[2]

  1. Robert Wilbor, 14 Jan 1715
  2. Thomas Wilbor, 14 Sep 1716
  3. Susanna Wilbor, 10 Jun 1718
  4. Mary Wilbor, 14 Mar 1720
  5. Abishai Wilbor, 22 Nov 1722
  6. Elizabeth Wilbor, 23 Jul 1723
  7. Martha Wilbor, 11 Mar 1725
  8. Ruth Wilbor, 20 Nov 1726
  9. Esek Wilbor, 22 Dec 1728
  10. Samuel Wilbor, 10 Oct 1730
  11. Susanna Wilbor, 29 May 1732 or Joanna Wilbore[3]
  12. Ebenezer Wilbor, 3 Sep 1735
  13. David WIlbor, 31 Jul 1740

Will

His last Will is dated 27 February 1749/1750, and recorded there on 7 April 1752.[4]

Research Notes

The Mayflower and its 99 passengers landed at Plymouth on 21 November 1620. The Fortune arrived in November 1621. During the next 65 years all the portion of southeastern Massachusetts and western Rhode Island was known as Plymouth County, 1621-1686.

January 13, 1629 - The Charter of Plymouth Colony was granted and included the area in which Little Compton is located.1659 to 1662 the lands in Little Compton were “purchased” from the Seaconet tribe of Indians

22 July 1673 - 29 men proved their shares in the grant of land at Seaconet; these 29 were the original proprietors of Little Compton. Of the original 29, who all lived in or near Duxbury, Plymouth Colony, “probably not five of their number had ever seen their goodly lands by the sea”.

1674 - First white settlement in the wilderness, which eventually became the Town of Little Compton.

In 1685/1686, when the division was made of Plymouth Colony, Bristol County had the towns of Taunton, Rehoboth, Dartmouth, Swansea, Bristol, Tiverton, Little Compton, Freetown and the plantations of Cumberland Gore and Attleboro. Little Compton’s name and land area was unchanged. The colonial charters of Plymouth, Rhode Island and Providence Plantations, Massachusetts Bay, Connecticut and New Hampshire were nullified by England and these 5 colonies were reorganized as a single government known as the Dominion of New England.

In 1746-1747, two towns, Little Compton and Tiverton, were acquired from Province of Massachusetts Bay, Colony of Great Britain and annexed to Rhode Island and Providence Plantations.

By 1747, Little Compton secured its own royal decree and was annexed to Newport County as a part of Rhode Island along with Tiverton and Bristol. Because Little Compton was once part of the Plymouth colony, all probate and land records prior to 1746 can be found in Taunton and New Bedford.

Sources

  1. VITAL RECORDS OF RHODE ISLAND,1636 - 1850, First Series, Births, Marriages and Deaths, A Family Register for the People, by James N. Arnold, Editor of the Narragansett Historical Register, “Is My Name Written in the Book of Life?” Volume 4. NEWPORT COUNTY; Little Compton, Part 1, Page 67; WILBOR, Samuel, and Elizabeth Carr; married by Richard Billings, Justice, December 24, 1713. Published under the Auspices of the General Assembly, Providence, Rhode Island; Narragansett Historical Publishing Company, 1893. Printed by the Providence Journal Company, Providence, Rhode Island. The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text https://archive.org/details/cu31924098819976/page/n473/mode/2up
  2. Vital Records of Rhode Island: 1636-1850 by James N Arnold, 1891, Vol 4 Children of Lamuel [Samuel] and Elizabeth https://archive.org/details/cu31924098819976/page/184/mode/2up
  3. Little Compton Families, Vol. 2; https://www.familysearch.org/library/books/viewer/27874/?offset=1#page=90&viewer=picture&o=&n=0&q=
  4. Ancestry.com (https://www.ancestry.com/imageviewer/collections/9079/images/007649137_00071). Rhode Island, U.S., Wills and Probate Records, 1582-1932 [database on-line], image 71-73, Newport, Little Compton, Book 1, page 124-127. Lehi, Utah: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2015.
  • VITAL RECORDS OF RHODE ISLAND,1636 - 1850, First Series, Births, Marriages and Deaths, A Family Register for the People, by James N. Arnold, Editor of the Narragansett Historical Register, “Is My Name Written in the Book of Life?” Volume 4. NEWPORT COUNTY; Little Compton, Part 1, Page 67; WILBOR, Samuel, and Elizabeth Carr; married by Richard Billings, Justice, December 24, 1713. Published under the Auspices of the General Assembly, Providence, Rhode Island; Narragansett Historical Publishing Company, 1893. Printed by the Providence Journal Company, Providence, Rhode Island. The original of this book is in the Cornell University Library. There are no known copyright restrictions in the United States on the use of the text.
  • RootsWeb's WorldConnect Project: They Came To Milton; ID:I13927
  • Wilbour, Benjamin Franklin; Little Compton Families, Volume I and Volume II. Baltimore, Maryland: Clearfield Company, Inc. by Genealogical Publishing Co. Inc., 2003.
  • Ancestry.com. Massachusetts, U.S., Town and Vital Records, 1620-1988 [database on-line]. Provo, Utah: Ancestry.com Operations, Inc., 2011.Original data: Town and City Clerks of Massachusetts. Massachusetts Vital and Town Records. Provo, Utah: Holbrook Research Institute (Jay and Delene Holbrook).

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Dale Burdick for starting this profile. Click the Changes tab for the details of contributions by Dale and others.





Is Samuel your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Samuel by comparing test results with other carriers of his Y-chromosome or his mother's mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known yDNA or mtDNA test-takers in his direct paternal or maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Samuel:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 5

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Wilbur-1678 and Wilbore-99 appear to represent the same person because: Wilbur-1678 was created in error as a duplicate. According to WikiTree guidelines the original profile should be maintained in the merge, which would be Wilbore-99.
posted by Eunice (Wilbur) Pender
Wilbore-99 and Wilbur-1678 do not represent the same person because: See WikiTree Help, Direction of a Merge

One profile is merged into another. It's not that the two profiles are combined into a new, third profile. Therefore, the "direction" of a merge matters.

We always merge a new duplicate into the original, first profile.

Therefore, the duplicate Wilbur-1678 created in error on January 14, 2021, should be merged into Wilbore-99, the original profile for this person that was created on December 17, 2013. The direction of the merge should be reversed—Wilbur-1678 into Wilbore-99.

posted on Wilbur-1678 (merged) by Eunice (Wilbur) Pender
Wilbore-99 and Wilbur-1678 appear to represent the same person because: These appear to be the same person because their birth dates, locations are the same. They have the same wife as well.
posted on Wilbur-1678 (merged) by Darcey Zumwalt
Samuel Wilbore, Jr. (1692-1752) who married Elizabeth Carr (1691-1764) is the son of Samuel Wilbore (1664-1740) and Mary Potter (dau. of Nathaniel Potter & Elizabeth Stokes). He is not the son of William J. Wilbore Jr.

See Wildbores in America, pg. 5 & 7.

posted by J. (Pearson) Salsbery
Wilbore-126 and Wilbore-99 appear to represent the same person because: Everything is the same, except for the father.
posted by Rick Pierpont

W  >  Wilbore  >  Samuel Wilbore