no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Rachel (DeWitt) Van Aken (bef. 1698 - aft. 1739)

Rachel Van Aken formerly DeWitt aka De Witt, Van Auken
Born before in Ulster, New Yorkmap
Ancestors ancestors
Wife of — married 15 Apr 1723 in Kingston, Ulster Co., NYmap
Descendants descendants
Died after after age 40 in Orange, New Yorkmap
Profile last modified | Created 13 Sep 2010
This page has been accessed 786 times.
{{{image-caption}}}
Rachel (DeWitt) Van Aken was a New Netherland Descendant 1674-1776.
Join: New Netherland Settlers Project
Discuss: new_netherland

Biography

Rachel was born in 1698. Rachel DeWitt ... She passed away in 1739.

age is an estimate

Christening - 23 AUG 1698, Ulster County, New York, USA

Marriage #501 in Hoes.

Sources


  • Baptismal and Marriage Registers of the Old Dutch Church of Kingston, Ulster County, New York, 1660-1809 Page 54 entry 1054 baptism both parties born and resid in Raysester (Rochester)
  • "Millennium File; Heritage Consulting; Ancestry.com Operations Inc; Marriage Date: 15 Apr 1723; [1]"
  • "De Witt Family Tree; Edith Lindemann on 22 Jan 2008; Ancestry with image [2]"

Acknowledgments

  • This person was created through the import of 124-DeCoursey.ged on 13 September 2010.




Is Rachel your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Rachel by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Rachel:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 3

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
A mother's death date should not be before one of her children's birth dates.
posted by Loretta (Leger) Corbin
DeWitt-1433 and DeWitt-22 appear to represent the same person because: They are one in the same person, I attempted different name spellings but she did not appear as a possible match. I am sorry!
posted by Charlotte Smith
Please merge DeWitt-1433 and DeWitt-22 - they are one in the same. I attempted name spellings of VanAken, DeWitt, De Witt and Van Auken but she was not recognized and her information did not come up for comparison. I have noticed some DeWitts are De_Witt-# and some are DeWitt-#; yet they are the same family. Can we reach a decision on this please. This is my second merge for the same family and I sincerely apologize but it would help if we could uniform the DeWitt or De_Witt - any ideas and suggestions would be awesome. Thank you!
posted by Charlotte Smith