no image
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Amanda E (Hustead) Rogers (1838 - 1936)

Amanda E Rogers formerly Hustead aka Boggess
Born in Virginiamap
Ancestors ancestors
Daughter of and
Wife of — married 31 Oct 1858 in Tyler Co., Virginiamap
Wife of — married 6 Apr 1866 in Harrison Co., West Virginiamap
Descendants descendants
Died at age 98 in West Virginiamap
Problems/Questions Profile managers: J Nathanson private message [send private message] and Denalda Beverly private message [send private message]
Profile last modified | Created 6 Feb 2013
This page has been accessed 212 times.

Biography

Amanda was born in 1838. Amanda married Thomas Rogers in Harrison County, WV on April 6, 1866.[1] She passed away in 1936. [2]


Sources

  1. West Virginia, Marriages Index, 1785-1971, Ancestry.com Operations Inc., Provo, UT: 2011
  2. Entered by J Nathanson, Feb 6, 2013
  • My grandmother Dora Gladys Rogers
  • "West Virginia Deaths, 1804-1999," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:F1G9-T85 : 11 February 2018), Amanda Hustead in entry for Curtis E. Rogers, 29 Oct 1945; citing Lumberport, Harrison, West Virginia, County Records, v 14 p 222a, county courthouses, West Virginia; FHL microfilm 847,175.
  • "West Virginia Marriages, 1780-1970," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:FBBX-H93 : 11 February 2018), Alonzo H Boggess and Amanda W Hustead, 1858; citing Tyler, West Virginia, United States, , county clerks, West Virginia; FHL microfilm 1,871,284.
  • "West Virginia Deaths, 1804-1999," database, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:NMCZ-JPR : 10 March 2018), Amanda Hustead in entry for Curtis E. Rogers, 29 Oct 1945; citing Harrison, West Virginia, County Records, 13035, county courthouses, West Virginia; FHL microfilm 1,983,805.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to J Nathanson for starting this profile.

Thank you to Denalda Beverly for creating WikiTree profile Hustead-39 through the import of Bush family.ged on Feb 11, 2013.

Click to the Changes page for the details of edits by Denalda and others.






Is Amanda your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Amanda by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA. However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Amanda:

Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.



Comments: 3

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Hustead-38 and Hustead-110 appear to represent the same person because: Exact dates, same spouse and child
The parents' "confirmed with DNA" relationship status indicators were removed because the DNA confirmation is undocumented.

Please see the G2G article on DNA confirmation for more information and guidance on how to provide the proper source documentation to confirm genealogy with DNA.

https://www.wikitree.com/g2g/490393/did-you-know-dna-confirmations-and-citations-are-like-peas-pod

posted by Sandy (Craig) Patak
Hustead-39 and Hustead-38 appear to represent the same person because: Exact dates and same spouse

H  >  Hustead  |  R  >  Rogers  >  Amanda E (Hustead) Rogers