Is Eleanor your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Eleanor by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Eleanor:
John-2880 and Unknown-13180 appear to represent the same person because: John-2880 is shown as married to Means-150 and two of his children are shown as hers. Her birth date is shown as 14 Feb 1679, relatively close to that of Unknown-13180. John-2880 was merged with Unknown-508935 which had been merged with Unk.-209.
Unknown-13180 was originally linked with husband Means-150 when it was imported from a gedcom. The initial WT profile included several children. Means-150 and the children were subsequently removed from Unknown-13180. The only information remaining in the profile is an 'about' birth date of 1685.
There are no reliable sources for the LNAB for John-2880. Therefore, John-2880 should be merged into Unknown-13180.
Unknown-13180 was originally linked with husband Means-150 when it was imported from a gedcom. The initial WT profile included several children. Means-150 and the children were subsequently removed from Unknown-13180. The only information remaining in the profile is an 'about' birth date of 1685.
There are no reliable sources for the LNAB for John-2880. Therefore, John-2880 should be merged into Unknown-13180.
Thanks
Unknowns Project
Thanks