Sarah was a daughter of Ahasuerus Marselis and Maria Vrooman, baptized in the Reformed Dutch Church of Schenectady, New York, on 7 October 1763. [1][2]
1763. Oct. 7. Ahaswerus Marselis, Maria Vrooman. Sarah. Witnesses: Claas Marselis, Lena Marselis.[1]
Research Notes
Children
FamilySearch.org has these children listed. Documentation is minimal yet useful for research for next generation!
Maria b. 1786
William b. 1787
Margareta b. 1788
Engeltje b. 1790
Anna b. 1793
Nicholas b. 1795
Ahasuerus b. 1797
Ahasuerus b.1799
Abraham b. 1800
Ann b. 1804
Burial Info Research:
(in order to locate this particular family)
findagrave #151478093 (Lakeforest Cemetery)
Email from a Find A Grave Contributor:
Although there is no record of a William Lighthall in the cemetery, there are a number of Lighthall's buried there in plots that were owned by a W.D. Lighthall (Section B, block 3, lot 8, Section B, block 13, Section B, block 3 lot 5) which may be the person you are looking for. There is a
Gordon, age 9, date of death 12 Jan 1911;
Harriet, 23 days old, 18 Jan 1916;
Harry, 2 days old, 29 Dec 1915,
Sarah E. July 1815-2 Apr 1900;
S. Hayes Lighthall 2 April 1900 (which is probably Sarah E. )
Elmer and Malinda. In Section B, block 3, graves 1-3 the burials do not have first names.
Grave 3 is probably Gordon since the burial date was 15 Jan 1911, but the others are listed as Lighthall, Unknown 2 and 3. I hope this information is helpful. Marlyn Hackett
Another Mrs. William Lighthall: Daughter-in-law Susan next generation.
Find a Grave Memorial # 31233577 for Susan S. Lighthall (Wethersfield Cemetery) this "stone" actually says Susan S. Lighthall wife of William d 1840. This stone belongs to the wife of William Lighthall Jr: Susan S (Unknown) Lighthall (1783-1840).
Is Sarah your ancestor? Please don't go away! Login to collaborate or comment, or
contact
a profile manager, or ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com
DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships with Sarah by comparing test results with other carriers of her mitochondrial DNA.
However, there are no known mtDNA test-takers in her direct maternal line.
It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Sarah:
I think this "stone" actually says 1810 but I am waiting on the FaG manager to confirm as photo is not clear. if it is 1810 then susan s lighthall wife of william very well be could be correct)
Why is she called "Susan Sarah"? The Austin Yates book (source cited here) calls her just "Sarah", and middle names were exceedingly rare as of 1743 (they weren't a thing until about 1800, after which time they were rapidly adopted).
I think this "stone" actually says 1810 but I am waiting on the FaG manager to confirm as photo is not clear. if it is 1810 then susan s lighthall wife of william very well be could be correct)