Alice FitzAlan, daughter of Richard De Arundel, K.G., 11th Earl of Arundel, and his wife Elizabeth de Bohun, became the mistress of Henry Beaufort (later Cardinal of England), and they had a daughter, Joan. Joan Beaufort married Sir Edward Stradling.[1] See comments. Joan Beaufort did marry Sir Edward Stradling, and she was a daughter of Henry Beaufort, but her mother was not Alice FitzAlan.[2]
Later, Alice married before 4th March 1492/3 John Cherleton, 4th Lord Cherleton, Lord of Powis, Justice of North Wales. There was no issue of this marriage. [3]
Douglas Richardson in Royal Ancestry Vol. V page 52 on Alice FitzAlan/Arundel:[4]
There is no contemporary evidence that Alice Arundel was either mistress of Henry Beaufort, or that she was the mother of his illegitimate daughter, Joan, born say 1390. What little is known of Alice's life is that she married sometime before 4 March 1392/3 (date of her father's will) to John Cherleton, 4th Lord Cherleton. The earliest published instance of Alice being named as Joan Beaufort's mother is a treatise written by Sir Edward Strading in the period, 1561/66, in which the author states that his forebear, an earlier Sir Edward Stradling,"married with Jane, daughter to Henry Beauford, afterwards Cardinal, begotten (before he was priest) upon Alice, one of the daughters of Richard, Earl of Arundel." Sir Edward Stradling, author of the treatise, presumably based his statement on family muniments which have not survived. Actually little is known of Alice Arundel's life, beyond her marriage, her death prior to 1415, and the fact that she left no legitimate issue. Her dates of birth, marriage and death are all uncertain. Whatever the truth, Alice has been accepted as the mother of Henry Beaufort's child by all early knowledgeable authorities. During the time of 1388/93, Henry Beaufort was a student at Cambridge and Oxford Universities and not yet in holy orders. If Henry Beaufort's daughter Joan was born in that period, it is barely possible that Joan was the daughter of Alice Arundel. Suffice to say, further research is needed before the matter of Joan Beaufort's maternity can be satisfactorily resolved. For the time being, it is correct to say only that Joan Beaufort was the illegitimate daughter of Cardinal Henry Beaufort, "it is said" by Alice Arundel.
Alice (FitzAlan) Cherleton appears in Douglas Richardson's Magna Carta Ancestry in a trail from Gateway Ancestor Barbara (Aubrey) Bevan to Magna Carta Surety Baron Robert de Vere (vol. I, pages 73-75 AUBREY). However, this trail goes through Beaufort-6 who in 2019 was disproved as being the daughter of Alice (FitzAlan) de Arundel, thereby breaking this trail. See 2019 soc.genealogy.medieval post for more information.
Alice (FitzAlan) Cherleton appears in Magna Carta Ancestry in a Richardson-documented trail from Gateway Ancestors George Popham, William Pole (or Poole) and Elizabeth Pole (or Poole) to Magna Carta Surety Baron Robert de Vere (vol. IV, pages 114-122 STRADLING) that was badged by the Magna Carta Project in May 2015. This trail was also broken at Joan Beaufort.
Source list:
Featured German connections: Alice is 19 degrees from Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, 26 degrees from Dietrich Bonhoeffer, 21 degrees from Lucas Cranach, 22 degrees from Stefanie Graf, 22 degrees from Wilhelm Grimm, 22 degrees from Fanny Hensel, 27 degrees from Theodor Heuss, 20 degrees from Alexander Mack, 36 degrees from Carl Miele, 16 degrees from Nathan Rothschild, 22 degrees from Hermann Friedrich Albert von Ihering and 18 degrees from Ferdinand von Zeppelin on our single family tree. Login to see how you relate to 33 million family members.
Gateway Barbara Aubrey-17 also lost her trail, but I'm pretty sure she can get reconnected through Dennis-461 -> FitzAlan-633 (who's already badged).
Cheers, Liz
If the Magna Carta ancestry is withheld from Joan, then her trail is broken. (I've been running the trails to the Clares; Alice's mother Bohun-15 is a descendant of theirs, and they show up on the profile of Gateway Pole-68, but I think the trail at least needs re-review and at best needs to be redirected so that it does not go through Joan's "it is said" mother.) Thoughts?
In the meantime, I'm not adding Bohun-15's Descendant categories to either this profile or on down the line (and will remove them & de Lacy from Pole-68.
Cheers, Liz
Their daughter Joan remains connected to both of them as their child and her tree remains unchanged.
This conforms to WikiTree guidelines on unmarried parents.
Thank you Andrew for catching this error.
Their daughter Joan remains connected to both of them as their child and her tree remains unchanged.
This conforms to WikiTree guidelines on unmarried parents.
Thank you Andrew for catching this error.
If Alice is the mother (but not a wife), then how do we show the relationship, if not in the "wife" section?
Do we need another indicator setting such as "wife but not mother" or "mother but not wife"?
Granted we could (and should) include the relationship into the text box, but leaving it out of the wife section rather messes up the tree view.
Is there an 'official' policy on this?