Lydia (Burbank) Foster
Privacy Level: Open (White)

Lydia (Burbank) Foster (1644 - aft. 1698)

Lydia Foster formerly Burbank
Born in Rowley, Essex, Massachusetts Bay Colonymap
Wife of — married about 1655 in Rowley, MAmap
Descendants descendants
Died after after age 54 in Ipswich, Essex, Massachusetts Bay Colonymap
Profile last modified | Created 31 Mar 2011
This page has been accessed 2,198 times.

Contents

Biography

Wife of Abraham Foster — married about 1655 [uncertain] in Ipswich, Essex, MA.

Birth

17 Apr. 1644 VITAL RECORDS OF ROWLEY, 2 vols. (Salem, MA, 1928-31), 1:38 (FHL #974.45/R1 V28v). MAR: No mar record found. Deed of Abraham Foster to wife and children, 21 Dec 1698, bequeaths to "wife Lydia...which was given her by her father Burbank" (Essex Co. Deeds, 13:205-207 [FHL #866020]). Hence, Lydia Burbank married Abraham Foster.
"Massachusetts, Town Clerk, Vital and Town Records, 1626-2001," database with images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-L97M-592Y-M?cc=2061550&wc=Q4DQ-166%3A353349401%2C353511101%2C1006133602 : 29 November 2018), Essex > Rowley > Births, marriage intentions, marriages, deaths 1636-1835 > image 31 of 409; citing Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth, Boston.

Children

Children born in Ipswich, MA [1] [2]:
  1. Ephraim. b. 1657
  2. Abraham. b. 1659
  3. James. b. 1662
  4. Isaac. b. 1668
  5. Benjamin. b. 1670
  6. Ebenezer. b. 1672
  7. Mehitable. b. 1675
  8. Caleb. b. 1677
  9. Ruth. b. ??; m. 1702, Jeremiah Perley

Death

Research Note: A previous version of this profile listed her death as 29 MAR 1692 Boxford, Essex, Massachusetts, at age 47. However, subsequent research by Patrick Griffith (see comments below) demonstrates that Lydia was alive both during the Salem Witch Trials of 1692 [3] [4] where she appears on two indictments against Elizabeth Howe and at the time of her husband's death when his estate was distributed 21 December 1698 [5].

Elizabeth (Jackson) Howe was the sister-in-law of Abraham Foster's brother William, who married Mary (Jackson).


Sources

  1. https://archive.org/details/genealogyofburba00sedg_0/page/10/mode/2up
  2. https://archive.org/details/fostergenealogy01pier/page/124/mode/2up?q=burbank
  3. https://salem.lib.virginia.edu/n72.html#n72.4
  4. https://salem.lib.virginia.edu/n72.html#n72.5
  5. https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-99ZZ-BVLL?cc=2106411&wc=MCBG-3P8%3A361613201%2C361858101 : 22 May 2014), Essex > Deeds 1697-1700 vol 12-13 > image 422 of 538; county courthouses and offices, Massachusetts.




Is Lydia your ancestor? Please don't go away!
 star icon Login to collaborate or comment, or
 star icon contact private message private message private message a profile manager, or
 star icon ask our community of genealogists a question.
Sponsored Search by Ancestry.com

DNA Connections
It may be possible to confirm family relationships. It is likely that these autosomal DNA test-takers will share some percentage of DNA with Lydia: Have you taken a test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.


Comments: 4

Leave a message for others who see this profile.
There are no comments yet.
Login to post a comment.
Is there a source for a 1692 death, in Boxford or elsewhere?

This would appear to be Lydia, wife of Abraham Foster, who appears on two indictments against Elizabeth How, dated 29 June 1692 (https://salem.lib.virginia.edu/n72.html#n72.4; https://salem.lib.virginia.edu/n72.html#n72.5; also https://salem.lib.virginia.edu/n72.html#n72.7).

posted by Patrick Griffith
edited by Patrick Griffith
Okay, yeah, no. Lydia was alive when Abraham distributed his estate 21 December 1798. Mentions the household stuff given to her by her father Burbank. ("Massachusetts Land Records, 1620-1986," images, FamilySearch (https://familysearch.org/ark:/61903/3:1:3QS7-99ZZ-BVLL?cc=2106411&wc=MCBG-3P8%3A361613201%2C361858101 : 22 May 2014), Essex > Deeds 1697-1700 vol 12-13 > image 422 of 538; county courthouses and offices, Massachusetts.)
posted by Patrick Griffith
Burbank-270 and Burbank-17 appear to represent the same person because: This Lydia Burbank is a clear duplicate. I did not create it, but am now managing the profile to be able to merge it with the correct Lydia Burbank Foster profile (Burbank-17). I would appreciate it if you could merge this obvious duplicate. Thanks!
posted by Kent Burbank
I am trying to help clean up the Burbank line in WikiTree. There are two orphaned profiles for Lydia Burbank, one with a b. 1622 (Burbank-276) and the other b. 1634 (Burbank-270). There simply cannot be any Lydia Burbank that matches these birth dates since the first Burbank immigrant to the U.S. from which virtually all Burbanks descend is John who arrived in the US around 1635. We know that the first Lydia Burbank, his daughter, is this one, born in 1644. Thus, these two stray Lydia's must be this Lydia. Since they are orphaned and clearly wrong, can you merge them into this one?
posted by Kent Burbank
edited by Kent Burbank

Featured Eurovision connections: Lydia is 29 degrees from Agnetha Fältskog, 21 degrees from Anni-Frid Synni Reuß, 25 degrees from Corry Brokken, 17 degrees from Céline Dion, 23 degrees from Françoise Dorin, 23 degrees from France Gall, 25 degrees from Lulu Kennedy-Cairns, 24 degrees from Lill-Babs Svensson, 16 degrees from Olivia Newton-John, 30 degrees from Henriette Nanette Paërl, 28 degrees from Annie Schmidt and 16 degrees from Moira Kennedy on our single family tree. Login to see how you relate to 33 million family members.

B  >  Burbank  |  F  >  Foster  >  Lydia (Burbank) Foster