| Roger II (Montgomery) de Montgomery is managed by the Medieval Project. Pre-1500 certified? Join: Medieval Project Discuss: Medieval |
Contents |
Roger was part of a powerful clique in Normandy, several of whom shared descent from sisters of Gunnora, the "Danish" wife of Richard I of Normandy. As described by Keats-Rohans (p.399), he was "a kinsman, friend and trusted companion" of William the conqueror, and he and his father apparently supported him through the difficult times when he struggled to take control of Normandy as a bastard son who was still very young when his father died.
As reported in Complete Peerage, he was found frequently in the Norman court record in the 1040s and 1050s. During the 1066 invasion, he remained in Normandy to support the running of government and then joined the king in England in 1067.
After the death of King William, Roger's position with regards to the conflict between Williams two competing oldest sons William Rufus and Robert Curthose has been described as equivocal (CP Vol.11. p.686).
Keats-Rohan also mentions that in England he had built up one of the largest estates in the country by the 1086 Domesday Book.
Roger is commonly referred to as Roger of Montgomery (with various spellings). As explained by Loyd (p.68), Montgomery refers to the area of two neighbouring modern French municipalities, both of which apparently had castles: Germain-de-Montgommery and Sainte-Foy-de-Montgommery. These are in the département of Calvados and both have modern postcode 14140.
As explained for example in Complete Peerage under Shrewsbury, there has been uncertainty about Roger's mother. A Joscelin, relative of Gunnora (a relative of the Duke) is often proposed, but on the other hand, she is sometimes proposed to be a mother of Roger's father instead.
In Normandy, Roger inherited the lordship of Montgomery from his father and also became vicomte of Hiesmois. (In this period a Norman vicomte was similar to an Anglo-Norman sheriff. This was a real administrative position.)
Furthermore, as Keats-Rohan remarks, his first wife, although she had brothers "became the family's heiress in order to permit peace between her family and the dukes of Normandy after many years of conflict between them". Complete Peerage"'s Arundel article (p.230) lists two of these lordships as Alençon and Séez.
He became very powerful in England and while the status of Anglo-Norman Earls was still developing Roger was sometimes called a "prince" (princeps). After 1074 at the latest, and famously in Domesday Book in 1086, he was often referred to simply as Count Roger (Latin "Comes Rogerus"). This was based on his status in England, as one of the first Anglo-Norman Earls. It was not a French title. (It was during this period that Earls began to be consistently translated as Comes meaning count in Latin.) Complete Peerage under Arundel emphasizes (p.233) that in Domesday "no local designation is attributed to him" as count or earl. Under Shrewsbury CP states that "there is no charter evidence that Roger was ever styled “comes” until the creation of the Earldom of Shrewsbury" in 1074 (Vol.11 p.685, also see Appendix K, written by Loyd). Therefore his position in the march at Shrewsbury was perhaps what originally got him considered a count or earl.
The date of the Earldom of Shrewsbury being created is not clear, and indeed it may not have happened in the way later Earldoms were "created". Loyd in Complete Peerage (Vol.11 App.K) shows carefully that there is no evidence of Roger being commonly known as an Earl until December 1074, but other historians point out that he possibly started establishing himself as early 1068 (the opinion of Lewis). The English claimant of the Earldom died 1071, and this date is for example used by Keats-Rohan.
The other earldom he is referred to as having is Arundel, which was in his time approximately the western third of Sussex, including the Rapes of both Chichester and Arundel. Its origins are even less clear than for Shrewsbury, from which it may have indirectly achieved its status as an earldom. As discussed by CP, there was no fixed name, and it was apparently also called the earldom of Sussex or Chichester. His castle of Arundel came to be seen as specially linked to this title in later times. The earlier-written Complete Peerage article for Arundel explains:
(1) Mabel, daughter and heiress (despite having brothers) of William Talvas, lord of Belléme and Alencon. CP estimates that this took place between 1050 and 1054. She was murdered approximately 1079, years before the invasion of England. Sons, using descriptions based upon Complete Peerage (under Shrewsbury):
4 daughters:
(2) Adelaide, daughter of Everard Depuiset. One known son:
Complete Peerage gives a detailed analysis of the evidence to show that he died "27 July 1094 at Shrewsbury and having been clothed as a monk three days before his death was buried there in the abbey which he had founded".
See also:
Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.
Featured Eurovision connections: Roger II is 44 degrees from Agnetha Fältskog, 29 degrees from Anni-Frid Synni Reuß, 34 degrees from Corry Brokken, 29 degrees from Céline Dion, 29 degrees from Françoise Dorin, 35 degrees from France Gall, 30 degrees from Lulu Kennedy-Cairns, 36 degrees from Lill-Babs Svensson, 29 degrees from Olivia Newton-John, 41 degrees from Henriette Nanette Paërl, 38 degrees from Annie Schmidt and 26 degrees from Moira Kennedy on our single family tree. Login to find your connection.
M > Montgomery | D > de Montgomery > Roger (Montgomery) de Montgomery
Categories: Domesday Book | Earls of Shrewsbury | Earls of Arundel | Early Barony of Arundel | Clan Montgomery
https://archive.org/stream/genealogicalhist00mont#page/24/mode/2up