| John Lewis Jr. is currently protected by the Puritan Great Migration Project for reasons described in the narrative. Join: Puritan Great Migration Project Discuss: PGM |
This profile is labeled as "Puritan Great Migration Adjunct" so that it can be monitored to avoid recreation or re-attachment to the disputed parents mentioned below.
Contents |
Many genealogies have a John Lewis listed as a child of Sarah (Meed) Lewis and her husband, John Lewis . There are no reliable sources that indicate that John and Sarah had a child named John. Their oldest known child was Sarah Lewis, who, according to an article in NEHGR, was the only child who accompanied them on the ship Hercules in 1635.[1] (see "Research Notes" below for excerpts from the passenger lists)
One possible misconception comes from Caulkins' book of 1895 in which he believes that the John Lewis who was in Scituate (Kent, England migrant aboard the Hercules) disappeared from the Scituate records after 1637 and then a John Scituate (the person of this profile) who appears in New London, Connecticut in 1648, are one and the same.[2] What Caulkins must not have known is that John Lewis went to Boston, not New London.
It is unknown where or when this John Lewis was born, or who his parents were. It has been surmised that his father was also named John Lewis, as per Jacobus' TAG article.[3]
In 1670, John Lewis was presented by the grand jury for absenting himself at unseasonable hours of the night, to the great grief of his parents. And with Sarah Chapman, presented for sitting together on the Lord's day under an apple tree in Goodman Chapman's orchard.[4]
He was a young man in 1670 and was over 30 years old in 1685; he was constable in New London in 1681 and was sergeant of the train band after 1700.
He died at New London, May 8th, 1717, being killed by being hit on the head by the limb of a tree that he was having felled for the bark thereof, while he sat on horseback under the tree, and was buried in New London, May 9th, 1717.[5] He married at New London, Conn. May 24th, 1677 to Elizabeth Huntley[6] (daughter of John and Jane (____) Huntley of Lyme, Connecticut. [7]
An inventory of the estate of John Lewis, late of New London, deceased, was taken 11 July 1717 and presented in court the same day, Elizabeth Lewis, widow and relict, making oath.[8] 8 April 1718, Elizabeth Lewis, admx., gave an accounting of debts paid from the estate.[9]
The disputed parents emigrated soon after their first child's birth, daughter Sarah, aboard the ship "Hercules", arriving in Scituate, Massachussets, in 1635. From Hotten's The Original Lists of Persons of Quality...
In NEHGR vol. 75:
It has been proven that the John Lewis this profile represents is neither the same as the John Lewis (bef.1606-aft.1669) who emigrated to America aboard the ship Hercules, nor is he the son of that man. They should neither be merged nor should a father/son relationship added between them.
Donald Lines Jacobus, "John Lewis of New London, Conn.; Joseph Lewis of Simsbury, Conn.,” American Genealogist 37[1961]:123-28 as copied from Mattocks Family Heritage Resources, https://mattocks2.wordpress.com/2008/05/04/john-lewis-of-new-london-conn-joseph-lewis-of-simsbury-conn/. Copy/paste follows:
Have you taken a DNA test? If so, login to add it. If not, see our friends at Ancestry DNA.
Featured National Park champion connections: John is 12 degrees from Theodore Roosevelt, 18 degrees from Stephanus Johannes Paulus Kruger, 8 degrees from George Catlin, 14 degrees from Marjory Douglas, 24 degrees from Sueko Embrey, 12 degrees from George Grinnell, 23 degrees from Anton Kröller, 12 degrees from Stephen Mather, 20 degrees from Kara McKean, 14 degrees from John Muir, 15 degrees from Victoria Hanover and 24 degrees from Charles Young on our single family tree. Login to find your connection.
Categories: Tenterden, Kent | Puritan Great Migration Adjunct
Any comments/thoughts?
HoNL opines that the John who came on the Hercules in 1635 was the man of Scituate in 1637 and was also the man who came to New London by 1648. Caulkins asserts that because he (Lewis) "disappears from records of that town (Scituate)". So he conflates THIS profile (John of New London, currently the merge target John-1672) with John-2526 who WAS the Hercules immigrant, lived in Scituate and then moved to Boston where his first wife Sarah died and then he remarried Alice Mattock. That seems to be where Caulkins tripped up, he did not recognize that John of Scituate moved to Boston and finished out his life there.
Re: the father "John" of the man/men of New London, Jacobus found that land deed where in 1692 John "the younger" (i.e. John-8863/1672) sold land that he got from his father John, so it seems that John-1672 has a valid father John Lewis attached. Jacobus could not have been referring to the son of John 8863/1672 as "the younger" because that John (John the "3rd) was born in 1685 so was only 7 years old in 1692 when the land was sold.
Further the deponent sayeth not.
edited by Brad Stauf
edited by Scott Carles
Although it looks like the "why" is because the profiles were gedcom-imported that way, probably conflated with the 1635 immigrant. I see that her spouse relationship to the father of this profile was severed a while back but the mother relationship to this profile was left intact.
My original commet suggested merging Sarah Unknown with Sarah Meed-4 as that was her original intent (apparently i.e. as the mother of a not-known-to-exist John Jr of Massachusetts) but I didn't make it clear that first she needed to be severed as mother of this profile.
edited by Brad Stauf
Same spouse, same death date and place, son John with same birthdate on both profiles. Please remove the unsourced parents from -46838 and merge to -1672.
Quality sources are required.
A matching Y-DNA test proves that two men, in this case Lewis descendants, share a common ancestor. The test doesn't prove, however, that we've identified the correct Lewis ancestor along every step of the way.
My family has been researching our Lewis line for more than 100 years. Our conclusion based on this extensive research is that we descend from this John Lewis - but that doesn't mean we're right.
If you're a male Lewis who believes you descend from this John Lewis, please consider taking a Y-DNA test from FamilyTreeDNA (the more expensive you can justify, the better). Or, if you already have, please contact me.
My family's Lewis Big Y-700 kit# at FTDNA is 890293. I'd love to hear from those who match to us. If you don't, and you believe you descend on this line, that important to know too.
Thank you! - Kevin Ireland
edited by Kevin Ireland