| Thomas Graves is currently protected by the Puritan Great Migration Project for reasons described in the narrative. Join: Puritan Great Migration Project Discuss: PGM |
Thomas Graves of Hartford is associated with the Puritan Great Migration Project, because of the presence of other Puritan Great Migration profiles with the same name.
Thomas Graves, whose parents are not known, was born around 1590, probably in the vicinity of Hertfordshire, England since records for his family are found in Thundridge, southern Hertfordshire and DNA studies link the Graves' families to this area of England.[1]
Thomas married Sarah Scott in England by 1621. She was born about 1599; the daughter of Christopher Scott of Hatfield Broadoak in Essex England. The Scott family lived in eastern Hertfordshire along the River Stort. No baptismal records have been found for Sarah since the records at Hatfield Broadoak begin in the year 1650.[1]
This will indicates that Christopher Scott was the father of Sarah, wife of Thomas Graves; and that Thomas Graves and Sarah (Scott) Graves had children Mary, Isaac, John, Elizabeth, and Nathaniel - delineated below.
Children of Thomas Graves and his wife Sarah (Scott) Graves; all born in England:[1]
Note: The Graves Genealogy includes a son Samuel as their third child[4] (so born about 1625). He is not mentioned in the list of Sarah (Scott) Graves children in the will of Christopher Scott,[1] If Samuel did exist, he would have died before then.
The family migrated sometime prior to 1645, settling in Hartford, Connecticut where he was a farmer.[2]However, he was not a proprietor of Hartford.[5]The first record found in New England was at Hartford, Connecticut in that year when "Tho: Graues is freed fro[m] Trayneing, watching & warding," as he was an elderly man by that time.[5][6] An additional record was entered on March 14, 1649/50 indicating the lands he owned; the first being a three acre lot with a dwelling house on it.[7]and he had two additional pieces of property.[8] and there is also a record dated November 23, 1659 when John Winthrop Jr. treated "Graves Tho[mas] his wife above 60 y[ears].[1]His family was intricately involved in political and religious activites; being respected citizens they served on juries, were surveyors, fence viewers, and set boundary lines between the local towns.[8]
In 1661 he moved to Hadley, Massachusetts along with his wife and sons John & Isaac.[1]John Card Graves in his work "Genealogy of the Graves Family in America" speculates that a schism in the church at Hartford is what precipitated his move to Hadley. The practice had arisen of allowing persons who had been baptized, (if not having a "scandalous character,") to consent to the covenant and thus be permitted to have their children baptized. Thomas Graves, being a uncompromising Puritan, would have been strongly adverse to this practice, so just as they had left England for the new world, they were now willing to leave Hartford to settle in the newer wilderness of Hadley.[8]
Hadley had been formed as a place to inhabit in 1659, and an agreement was made by the townsmen that those "inhabiting there in houses of own by Michaelmas next" September 29, 1661. Twenty eight people signed the agreement - which did not include Thomas Graves. Before March 25, 1661 Thomas was one of twenty-five additional people indicating they wished to establish homes on the west side of the river, a location which became known Hadley, Massachusetts[9]
Thomas died in November 1662.[10] His son Isaac administered his estate in Massachusetts, and his son Nathaniel performed the same service in Connecticut. His wife, Sarah, survived him for four years, and Isaac administered her estate. [11]
Thomas Graves was buried at Hadley in November of 1662; his widow Sarah was buried there as well on December 17, 1666.[1]
Disambiguation: This profile is for Thomas Graves the farmer of Hartford and Hadley who was first recorded at Hartford in 1645 with his wife Sarah (Scott) Graves and 5 children, apparently all born in England and migrated together. Do not confuse or muddle this profile with Admiral Thomas Graves or Engineer Thomas Graves.
Disputed Parents: A previous version of this profile claimed parents Thomas Graves and Alis (Unknown) Graves citing a christening record 90 miles from where Thomas married and christened his children.[12]. But we have not confirmed these are the same Thomas Graves and current research (see biography) says parents are unknown. As well, do not add John Graves and Sarah Malter as this person's parents.
Wife not Sarah Whiting: Previously Sarah Whiting was attached as the wife of Thomas Graves. She has been detached because current scholarly research indicates the wife of Thomas Graves was Sarah Scott. Please see biography for research and source citations.
George Graves is probably a cousin, not brother: Colonists George Graves and Thomas Graves were probably distant cousins, not brothers since Thomas was not mentioned in George's will.[13]
See Also: CAUTION - The following sources may or may not apply to this Thomas Graves-172.
Featured Asian and Pacific Islander connections: Thomas is 22 degrees from 今上 天皇, 17 degrees from Adrienne Clarkson, 21 degrees from Dwight Heine, 21 degrees from Dwayne Johnson, 16 degrees from Tupua Tamasese Lealofioaana, 18 degrees from Stacey Milbern, 16 degrees from Sono Osato, 30 degrees from 乾隆 愛新覺羅, 20 degrees from Ravi Shankar, 23 degrees from Taika Waititi, 21 degrees from Penny Wong and 15 degrees from Chang Bunker on our single family tree. Login to see how you relate to 33 million family members.
"Re: Thomas Graves of Gravesend, Kent; Migration :1629; First Residence: Charlestown; Return Trips: Apparently left New England in 1633; Occupation: Engineer. On 10 Mar 1628/9, Thomas Graves of Gravesend, Kent, gent., signed a contract with the Massachusetts Bay Company, in which he claimed to be skilled in the discovery of mines, in "fortifications of all sorts" in surveying, and in various other similar specialties [MBCR 1:30, 32-33, 390-91; Young's First Planters 53-54, 56-59, 152-540]." The record goes on to mention that "In his contract, asked to have Company pay costs of transporting his wife, five children, and two servants [MBCR 1:32-33; Young's First Planters 58]."
Family Members: With wife and 5 children. Source Publication Code 6799.25 (Original data: Filby, P. William, ed. Passenger and Immigration Lists Index, 1500s-1900s. Farmington Hills, MI, USA: Gale Research, 2012.)
Also Source: U.S. New England Marriages Prior to 1700; (Not sure why this was in the New England Marriages) (Graves, Thomas (- 1662) & Sarah Scott ( -1666); by 1623 Thundridge, Hertfordshire/Hartford [LMM]
If this in not correct than my sources are wrong as well..
https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:JWJ7-F9X?from=lynx1UIV8&treeref=LJ22-2XL https://gravesfa.org/gen168.htm Sincerely Donna Riggs (Beebe)
Reverted the birth date back to bef 1590 used in the TAG article. The 1585 date was from another incorrect theory.
edited by Joe Cochoit
Please if someone add this information.
Thanks Donna Riggs (Beebe)
This profile is for Thomas Graves the farmer of Hartford and Hadley who was first recorded at Hartford in 1645 with his wife Sarah (Scott) Graves and 5 children, apparently all born in England and migrated together.
The first two children of this profile are listed as being born in England. The next is born in Connecticut. The next two are born in Massachusetts. The next has no birth location. Do not see how the information matches. Since this is Project Protected, I am just passing along my observation.
Project leader(s) or Profile Manager(s): This profile is PPP, could someone 1) ADD Mary Graves (daughter, already attached to mother) and 2) DETACH George Graves. (He belongs to another family and needs to be merged with a dupe).
Also, does anyone know where does the specific date in his birth come from??? It looks like that maybe a coincidental baptism that should just be in research notes...
Mary Graves-209 is not yet attached and needs additional research, please. While trying to connect her with this family, I received a DBE that parents was 13 years old etc.
https://archive.org/details/genealogyofgrave01grav/page/6
and I wonder if the
should be here since she died in Maryland.
Disconnect? Comments?
Why not to merge them? Only to keep duplicates from being created, which is of course also a good reason. In which case detach the children, mark her a non-existent person etc.
I've left comments on the profiles of Grace & George - hoping the PM will respond. Additionally on the profile of Elizabeth since the b & d place of that particular Elizabeth seems unreasonable to me.
Sarah Scott-17829 has been attached as his wife, per sources and biography on this profile. See note at top of this profile.
My recommendation would be to detach with an appropriate note - else she may just be created again since there is a lot of misinformation about her on the internet.
https://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=wu.89067408831&view=1up&seq=391
I checked, no surname mentioned for the wife of Thomas Graves of Hartford - only "married, perhaps about 1615, Sarah _____ " who d. Hatfield 17 Dec. 1666, prob m. of all his children.