G2G: ? - Is this ''real'' King George IV -

Question

 - This profile 'popped' today , when looking for the true King George IV - (Hannover-16) - -

Profile manager: Daryll Hollenberg [send private message]

Hanover-229 created 27 Oct 2020 | Last modified 17 Nov 2020

This page has been accessed 9 times.

 - = profile of George Hanover. = -

Happy New Year - -

Answer 1

Well they need to be merged but surely not until the wife and child are detached. "Unsourced family tree" cannot substantiate such a claim. Needs to be handled by a project.

Answer 2

Shouldn't the last name be Hanover according to this discussion https://www.wikitree.com/g2g/1146833/standardising-the-name-the-royal-house-great-britain-hanover?show=1146833#q1146833

(Added tag for England)

Comments

Thanks for the England tag Maggie.

Answer 3

The England Project (as PM for Hannover-16) will organise the merge. Thanks for spotting it John.

Comments

- Thank you Jo , for taking up the baton - -

perhaps the (N=NN)'s have it , which led me to your thread of the 1st Dec. It in turn , led me to revisit my copy of ''Britain's Kings and Queens'' , by Sir George Bellew KCVO , Pitkin series 1971 Ed. He uses 'N' in his narrative throughout for the House of Hanover - -

However , Wikipedia defines the City of HaNNover , and then goes on to use HaNover in its narrative ! -

 - = https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hannover_(disambiguation) = -  

Maybe , fortunately , there is no 'NN's in Windsor - - - cheers

---

It's a tricky one and for the later monarchs, there is a very good case for one N Hanover, as that was the adapted version in Britain.